DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc., 201 N.W. 435.

26 citing documents.

  • Daniel Francis Link, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    See Stevens v. N. States Motor, Inc., (implying that official immunity applied to officials charged with maintaining highways).
  • Nathan Kariniemi v. City of Rockford 882 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 2016
  • Nathan Kariniemi v. City of Rockford 882 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 2016
    916, 916 (1930) (commissioner of highways);12 Stevens v. N. States Motor, Inc., 161 Minn. 345, 348, 201 N.W.
  • Bauer v. State 511 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1994
  • Bauer v. State 511 N.W.2d 447 Minn. 1994
    For example, in a 1925 case, Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc., 161 Minn. 345 , 201 N.W.
  • Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
  • Susla v. State 247 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1976
  • Susla v. State 247 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1976
    Johnson v. Callisto, 287 Minn. 61 , Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218 , Wilbrecht v. Babcock, 179 Minn. 263 , Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345
  • Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1972
  • Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1972
    See, Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , Modlin v. City of Miami Beach, 201 So.
  • McCorkell v. City of Northfield 123 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1963
  • McCorkell v. City of Northfield 123 N.W.2d 367 Minn. 1963
    He also held, apparently under the authority of Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , , and Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , , 40 A. L. R. 36, that the city officials named as defendants could not be liable because the activity did not involve an exercise of ministerial duties required to be performed by them in obedience to a mandate of legal authority.
  • Stevens v. Lycan & Co. 105 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1960
  • Stevens v. Lycan & Co. 105 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1960
    It is distinguished in Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345, 349 , , 40 A. L. R. 36, 38, where we said: «* * * The case of Tholkes v. Decock, * * * was a case of misfeasance on the part of the overseer in repairing a culvert in a public highway.
  • Dunn v. Schmid 60 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1953
  • Dunn v. Schmid 60 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1953
    As to the liability of administrative and judicial officers for tort generally, see Jennings, Tort Liability of Administrative Officers, 21 Minn. L. Rev. 263 ; Davis, Administrative Law, § 231; Wilbrecht v. Babcock, 179 Minn. 263 , ; Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345, 348 , , 40 A. L. R. 36 (dicta in two foregoing cases); Linder v. Foster, 209 Minn. 43 , , wherein Stewart v. Cooley, 23 Minn. 347 , 23 Am.
  • Giefer v. Dierckx 40 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1950
  • Giefer v. Dierckx 40 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1950
    That decision was later followed in Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , , 40 A. L. R. 36.
  • Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne 34 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1948
  • Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne 34 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1948
    Stevens v. North *136 States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345, 348 , , 40 A. L. R. 36.
  • Cook v. Trovatten 274 N.W. 165 Minn. 1937
  • Cook v. Trovatten 274 N.W. 165 Minn. 1937
    ility of a public officer for nonfea-sance attaches only “when the duty is ministerial, that is, when it is in obedience to the mandate of legal authority and the act is to be performed in a prescribed manner, without the exercise of the officer’s judgment upon the propriety of the act, and the failure to perform is the proximate cause of the injury sustained.” Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345, 348 , , 40 A. L. R. 36; 5 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Wilbrecht v. Babcock 228 N.W. 916 Minn. 1930
  • Wilbrecht v. Babcock 228 N.W. 916 Minn. 1930
    Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , , 40 A. L. R. 36; Roerig v. Houghton, 144 Minn. 231 , ; Bolland v. Gihlstorf, 134 Minn. 41 , ; Christensen v. Plummer, 130 Minn. 440 , ; Stewart v. Case, 53 Minn. 62 , , 39 A. S. R. 575; Stewart v. Cooley, 23 Minn. 347 , 23 Am.
  • Burns v. Essling 203 N.W. 605 Minn. 1925
  • Burns v. Essling 203 N.W. 605 Minn. 1925
    See Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , , 52 L. R. A. (N. S.) 142, and Stevens v. North States Motor Inc. 161 Minn. 345 , .