Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Skala v. Lindbeck, 214 N.W. 271.

29 citing documents.

Nancy L. Holzer, as Trustee of the Nancy L. Holzer Trust dated September 2, 2005, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Although there is no “particular manner by which an adverse possessor must possess a disputed tract of property,” Ganje, d at 266, it must be sufficient to give “unequivocal notice to the true owner” that someone is in possession of the property in hostility to the true owner’s title, Skala v. Lindbeck, 214 N.W. 271, 272 (Minn. 1927).
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
in an attempt to determine where the boundary line lay between the properties”); (reasoning that prior to a survey being conducted, “both parties believed [the fence] was located on the true boundary line between their respective holdings”); (stating that the parties acted as if the fence was the boundary line because they be
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert W. Starbeck, individually, and As Trustee of the Arthur C. Starbeck Trust under agreement Dated August 21, … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that “[a]ll [parties] concerned” thought that the adverse claimant’s predecessor in interest had purchased land up “to the fence,” and the parties acted as if the fence was the boundary line between the properties); (observing that “both parties believed [a fence] was located on the true boundary line between their respective holdings” until a survey revealed a different boundary); Fredericksen v. Henke, 209 N.W.
Mary Ann Karnowski v. Thomas George Wimmer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mary Ann Karnowski v. Thomas George Wimmer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Roger Saba, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A. Open and Actual Use3 To establish open and actual use, the claimant must use the land in such a way as to provide the owner with “unequivocal notice .” Skala v. Lindbeck
Court of A ppeals Chutich, J. St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC, Respondent, vs. Minn. 2020
Lyle Batton, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But it must give “unequivocal notice to the true owner that some one is in possession in hostility to his title.”
James A. Compart, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A disseizor may 10 strengthen his adverse claim by taking as many conveyances from those claiming or having an interest in the land as he sees fit.” Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410, 413, 214 N.W.
Mark G. Warrington v. Donald E. Falk, Robert A. Schmaltz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mark G. Warrington v. Donald E. Falk, Robert A. Schmaltz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Skala v. Lindbeck 171 Minn. 410, 413, 214 N.W.
Ganje v. Schuler 659 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Ganje v. Schuler 659 N.W.2d 261 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
But the possession must give “unequivocal notice to the true owner that some one is in possession in hostility to his title.” Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410, 413 , 214 N.W.
Block v. Sexton 577 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Block v. Sexton 577 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410, 413 , 214 N.W.
Ehle v. Prosser 197 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1972
Ehle v. Prosser 197 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1972
Mellenthin v. Brantman, 211 Minn. 336 , Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410 , Riley v. Kump, 170 Minn. 58 , Fredericksen v. Henke, 167 Minn. 356 , , 46 A. L. R. 785 (1926); Kelley v. Green, 142 Minn. 82
Thomas v. Mrkonich 78 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
Thomas v. Mrkonich 78 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
See, Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410 , .
Voegele v. Mahoney 54 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1952
Voegele v. Mahoney 54 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1952
Mattson v. Warner, 115 Minn. 520 , ; Rupley v. Fraser, 132 Minn. 311 , ; Cain v. Highland Company, 134 Minn. 430 , ; Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410 , ; Naporra v. Weckwerth, 178 Minn. 203 , , 65 A. L. R. 124.
Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
Bryant v. Gustafson 40 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1950
§ 541.02; Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn, 410, .
Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; City of St.
Mellenthin v. Brantman 1 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1941
Mellenthin v. Brantman 1 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1941
Kelley v. Green, 142 Minn. 82, 85 , ; Fredericksen v. Henke, 167 Minn. 356, 360, 361 , , 46 A. L. R. 785; Riley v. Kump, 170 Minn. 58, 59 , ; Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410, 413, 414 , .