Cited by

No. 17, (relying on stare decisis to apply same construction of statute that court previously interpreted in a different case).

No. 17, 173 Minn. 5, 6-7 , 216 N.W.

No. 17, 173 Minn. 5 , 216 N.W.

No. 17, 173 Minn. 5 , 216 N.W.

2 Rule VIII(2), 222 Minn. xxxii ; cf. State v. McBride, 215 Minn. 123 , 9 N. W. (2d) 416 ; State v. Sterling, 173 Minn. 610 , .

For lack of an adequate record, we refuse to review these cases, under the rule of our decisions in State v. McBride, 215 Minn. 123 , 9 N. W. (2d) 416 , and State v. Sterling, 173 Minn. 610 , .

Defendants’ original record on appeal did not comply with Rule VIII(2) of this court ( 212 Minn. xli ) with respect to matters to be included therein, and the case ivas not properly before us. State v. Sterling, 173 Minn. 610 , .

No. 17, 173 Minn. 5 , ; Bank v. Brainerd School Dist.

No. 17, 173 Minn. 5 , 216 N.W.

No. 17, 173 Minn. 5 , , and cases cited.