Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 232 N.W. 322.

41 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
App. P. 110.05 (providing that this court may direct that errors be corrected either by motion of a party or on its own initiative); (characterizing a clerical error as an error of form that “includes one made by the court which cannot reasonably be attributed to the exercise of judicial consideration or discretion”); (construing one word as another when it reflect
In re the Marriage of: Chriss O. Latterell v. Mary Jean Latterell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Chriss O. Latterell v. Mary Jean Latterell Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Generally, a clerical mistake “is apparent upon the face of the record and capable of being corrected by reference to the record only.” Medtronic, ().
Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lisa Ann Poseley v. Andrew Scott Duff, and Lisa Ann Poseley on Behalf of Minor ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A clerical error is one that is: “apparent on the face of the record and capable of being corrected by reference to the record only.”
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
ion decree of a conclusion of law on the allocation of the children’s uninsured and unreimbursed medical costs was a clerical error and (2) by adding a conclusion of law to the 2012 dissolution decree because it is “not apparent upon the face 15 of the record” that the parties intended to split their children’s uninsured and unreimbursed medical costs.5
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
App. 1990) (quoting Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls , ).
In re the Marriage of: Janie Warren Berg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
22 To distinguish “clerical mistakes” that can be corrected at any time after entry of a judgment from other types of errors, district courts look to such factors as whether the alleged mistake is only “one of form” or is otherwise “apparent upon the face of the record and capable of being corrected by reference to the record only.”
Guardian Energy, LLC v. Cnty. of Waseca 927 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2019
Guardian Energy, LLC v. Cnty. of Waseca 927 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2019
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls , 181 Minn. 329 , 232 N.W.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
It is usually one of form.” Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332, 232 N.W.
In re the Marriage of: Terry Anne Boggs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
8 Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332
Moslais X. Vue, n/k/a Moslais Michele Xiong, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A clerical error “cannot reasonably be attributed to the exercise of judicial consideration or discretion.” Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332, 232 N.W.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel John Mechtel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Daniel John Mechtel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332, 232 N.W.
Candyce L. Brown v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Candyce L. Brown v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332, 232 N.W.
State v. Watkins 820 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Watkins 820 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
The state argues that the misspelling of B.N.T.’s last name in the written order and the erroneous birthdate are “typographical, clerical errors.” A clerical error is one “which cannot reasonably be attributed to the exercise of judicial consideration or discretion.” Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp. 630 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp. 630 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
Marriage of Brazinsky v. Brazinsky 610 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Marriage of Brazinsky v. Brazinsky 610 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
A clerical error is defined as “a mistake in the clerical work of transcribing the particular record.” Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
State v. Pflepsen 590 N.W.2d 759 Minn. 1999
8 permits a district court to correct clerical errors in sentencing "at any time.” In other contexts, we have defined a clerical error as one “which cannot reasonably be attributed to the exercise of judicial consideration or discretion.” Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329 , 232 N.W.
Eid v. Hodson 542 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Eid v. Hodson 542 N.W.2d 402 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
To support their position, the Hodsons cite to Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329 , 232 N.W.
Krutsch v. Walter H. Collin GmBh Verfahrenstechnik Und Maschinenfabric 495 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Krutsch v. Walter H. Collin GmBh Verfahrenstechnik Und Maschinenfabric 495 N.W.2d 208 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In re Appeal from Lake Alice Sewer Assessment, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
State v. Walsh 456 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Walsh 456 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
Gould v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gould v. Johnson 379 N.W.2d 643 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
Marriage of Egge v. Egge 361 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Egge v. Egge 361 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Although “clerical error” has been defined as an error of form made by the court itself, Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329, 332 , 232 N.W.
Hafner v. Hafner 54 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1952
Hafner v. Hafner 54 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1952
As to clerical mistakes generally, see Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329 , ; In re Estate of Simon, 187 Minn. 399 , ; Schloss v. George E. Lennon, Inc. 123 Minn. 420 , ; Annotations, 10 A. L. R. 526, 67 A. L. R. 828, 126 A. L. R. 956.
Duenow v. Lindeman 27 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1947
Duenow v. Lindeman 27 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1947
Wilson v. City of Fergus Falls, 181 Minn. 329 , .