Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnston v. Tourangeau, 259 N.W. 187.

29 citing documents.

Sonja Jeanne Timmons, individually, and as mother and natural guardian of Jadyn Bentlie Haugen, Kaily Marie Timmons and … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
.”); (noting that “absent .
Nelson v. Suburban Plumbing Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1969
Nelson v. Suburban Plumbing Supply Co. 167 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1969
Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , ; Ryberg v. Ebnet, 218 Minn. 115 , 15 N. W. (2d) 456 .
Mourning v. Interlachen Country Club 158 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1968
Mourning v. Interlachen Country Club 158 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1968
Assn. supra; Murray v. Albert Lea Home Investment Co. 202 Minn. 62 , ; Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , ; Wentink v. Traphagen, 138 Neb.
Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation 153 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1967
Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation 153 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 1967
The trial court directed a verdict on the authority of the rule laid down in Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , , on the ground that the plaintiff had assumed the risk and was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
Jones v. Whitaker Buick Co. 130 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
Jones v. Whitaker Buick Co. 130 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
It cites Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , , where we defined contributory negligence as want of ordinary or reasonable care on the part of a person injured by the negligence of another, directly contributing to the injury as a proximate cause.
Bridges v. Hillman 82 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1957
Bridges v. Hillman 82 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1957
This court said in Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635, 638 , , regarding contributory negligence: “The duty of care for others manifestly should be no higher than the duty of self-protection.
Koenigs v. Travis 75 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1956
Followed Koenigs v. Travis 75 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1956
Co. (8 Cir.) *480 141 F. (2d) 791; Anderson v. Federal Cartridge Corp. (D. C.) 62 F. Supp. 775 , affirmed (8 Cir.) 156 F. (2d) 681; see, Stabs v. City of Tower, 229 Minn. 552 , 40 N. W. (2d) 362 ; cf. Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , .
American Automobile Insurance v. Molling 57 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1953
American Automobile Insurance v. Molling 57 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1953
Co. (8 Cir.) 141 F. (2d) 791; Anderson v. Federal Cartridge Corp. (D. C.) 62 F. Supp. 775 , affirmed' (8 Cir.) 156 F. (2d) 681; see, Stabs v. City ■ of Tower, 229 Minn. 552 , 40 N. W. (2d) 362 ; cf. Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , .
Iverson v. Quam 32 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1948
Iverson v. Quam 32 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1948
Co. 202 Minn. 62 , ; Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , ; Plahn v. Masonic Hall Bldg.
Veaasen v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 27 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1947
Veaasen v. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. 27 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1947
Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , 259 N.W.
Ryberg v. Ebnet 15 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1944
Ryberg v. Ebnet 15 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1944
1 , ; Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , .
Sartori v. Capitol City Lodge No. 48, I. O. O. F. 4 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1942
Sartori v. Capitol City Lodge No. 48, I. O. O. F. 4 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1942
Contributory negligence was considered with respect to a similar fact situation in Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , .
Huyink v. Hart Publications, Inc. 2 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1942
Huyink v. Hart Publications, Inc. 2 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1942
In Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , , a tenant in an apartment building was held guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law for choosing to descend by a dark stairway to the back entrance of a building instead of by the lighted stairway to the regular entrance in the front.
Heinman v. United Properties, Inc. 298 N.W. 247 Minn. 1941
Heinman v. United Properties, Inc. 298 N.W. 247 Minn. 1941
Defendant relies on Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , .
Jewell v. Blanchett Investment Co. 271 N.W. 461 Minn. 1937
Jewell v. Blanchett Investment Co. 271 N.W. 461 Minn. 1937
The trial court directed a verdict on the authority of the rule laid down in the case of Johnston v. Tourangeau, 193 Minn. 635 , , on the ground that the plaintiff here had assumed the risk and was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.