Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Trust Under Will of Holden, 291 N.W. 104.

75 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Trust Under Will of Carrie Blumberg, deceased, for Robert C. Blumberg. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Although we construe words based on common and approved usage, “issue” is a technical term and “means lineal descendants including those of every degree.” In re Holden’s Tr.
In the Matter of The Leora L. Buerkle Irrevocable Insurance Trust dated September 17, 1993. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Cf. In re Holden’s Trust, -07 (Minn. 1940).
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 216 , cf. Minn.Stat.
In Re Estate of King 668 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Estate of King 668 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A testator’s intention must “be ascertained from the language of his will, which may have a meaning controlled by surrounding circumstances or context.” In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 215
In Re the Trust Created Under Agreement With Lane 660 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Trust Created Under Agreement With Lane 660 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
A settlor’s “intention must be ascertained from the language of his will, which may have a meaning controlled by surrounding circumstances or context.” In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 215
Webb Business Promotions, Inc. v. American Electronics & Entertainment Corp. 617 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 2000
Webb Business Promotions, Inc. v. American Electronics & Entertainment Corp. 617 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 2000
However, “[findings of fact which are controlled or influenced by error of law are not final on appeal and will be set aside.” In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227
Maurer v. Maurer 607 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Maurer v. Maurer 607 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227
Matter of Welfare of Mdo 450 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Matter of Welfare of Mdo 450 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
“Findings of fact which are controlled or influenced by error of law are not final on appeal and will be set aside.” In re Trust of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227
In Re Estate of Schroeder 441 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc., In Re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211
Application of Northern States Power Co. 440 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Application of Northern States Power Co. 440 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227
Chin v. Zoet 418 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Chin v. Zoet 418 N.W.2d 191 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In re Trust Under the Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227
Honn v. Coin & Stamp Gallery, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Honn v. Coin & Stamp Gallery, Inc. 407 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Trust of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227
Holstein v. Commissioner of Public Safety 392 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211 , 227, , 112 (1940).
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211
Knutson v. Primeau 371 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Knutson v. Primeau 371 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See In re Holden’s Trust, 207 Minn. 211, 227
Yliniemi v. Mausolf 371 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Yliniemi v. Mausolf 371 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , See also In Re Murphy’s Estate, 269 Minn. 393, 406
Toombs v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
Matter of Trust Created Under Agreement With McLaughlin 361 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1985
Toombs v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1985
The first case in Minnesota to hold that “lawful issue” is a technical phrase designating a class to which adoptees belong was In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211
In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With Harrington 250 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1977
In Re Trusts Created by Agreement With Harrington 250 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1977
The first major case interpreting the statute was In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211
Lifson v. Commissioner of Taxation 195 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1972
Lifson v. Commissioner of Taxation 195 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1972
In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211
In Re Estate of Murphy 269 Minn. 393 Minn. 1964
In Re Estate of Murphy 269 Minn. 393 Minn. 1964
[15] Cf. In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
In Re Trust Under Agreement With Nash 122 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1963
In Re Trust Under Agreement With Nash 122 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1963
6 In the case of In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , , this court laid to rest the question of whether the word “issue” includes adopted children of a life tenant by holding that it did.
In Re Trust Created by Will of Patrick 106 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1960
Patrick v. Northern City National Bank 106 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1960
In Re Trust Created by Will of Patrick 106 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1960
1171 ; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
Patrick v. Northern City National Bank 106 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1960
259.29; In re Estate of Youmans, 218 Minn. 172 , 15 N. W. (2d) 537 , 154 A. L. R. 1171; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
Olson v. Olson 53 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1952
Olson v. Olson 53 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1952
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , ; Lee v. Delmont, 228 Minn. 101 , 36 N. W. (2d) 530 .
Van Dyke v. First National Bank 46 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1951
In Re Trust Created by Moulton 233 Minn. 286 Minn. 1951
In Re Trust Created by Moulton 233 Minn. 286 Minn. 1951
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , *290 215, ; First & American Nat.
Van Dyke v. First National Bank 46 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1951
“* * * Absent tokens of meaning other than such as the language itself imports, intention must be found exclusively in the language.” In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, *290 215 , ; First & American Nat.
Lee v. Delmont 36 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1949