Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Trust Under Will of Holden, 291 N.W. 104.
-
Lee v. Delmont
36 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1949
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , ; 3 Am.
- Blacque v. Kalman 30 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1948
- Boyle v. Kirby 26 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1947
- In Re Trust Under Will of Davidson 26 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 1947
-
Boyle v. Kirby
26 N.W.2d 223
Minn. 1947
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
-
In Re Trust Under Will of Davidson
26 N.W.2d 223
Minn. 1947
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
- In Re Estate of Youmans 15 N.W.2d 537 Minn. 1944
-
In Re Estate of Youmans
15 N.W.2d 537
Minn. 1944
While we held in Fiske v. Lawton, 124 Minn. 85 , , and In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , , that the child adopted in each of those cases outside the state was entitled to inherit and take under our statutes, neither case involved the point now under consideration.
- In Re Estate of Boutelle 15 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1944
- Boutelle v. Renshaw 15 N.W.2d 506 Minn. 1944
-
Boutelle v. Renshaw
15 N.W.2d 506
Minn. 1944
Gf., for example, In re Estate of Norman, 209 Minn. 19, 26 , ; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 218 , .
-
In Re Estate of Boutelle
15 N.W.2d 506
Minn. 1944
63 , 66 ; In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 218 , , 108 .
- Country Club District Service Co. v. Village of Edina 8 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1943
-
Country Club District Service Co. v. Village of Edina
8 N.W.2d 321
Minn. 1943
In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 227 , .
- State v. Tennyson 2 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1942
- Larkin v. McCabe 299 N.W. 649 Minn. 1941
-
Larkin v. McCabe
299 N.W. 649
Minn. 1941
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , .
- In Re Estate of Norman 295 N.W. 63 Minn. 1940
- Olson v. Tubbs 295 N.W. 63 Minn. 1940
-
In Re Estate of Norman
295 N.W. 63
Minn. 1940
In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211 , 216 , , 107 .
-
Olson v. Tubbs
295 N.W. 63
Minn. 1940
“Technical words which have a definite and well understood meaning will be presumed to have been used in that sense in the absence of surrounding circumstances or context which show that a different meaning ivas intended.” In re Trust Under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 216 , .
- First and American National Bank v. Higgins 293 N.W. 585 Minn. 1940
-
First and American National Bank v. Higgins
293 N.W. 585
Minn. 1940
In re Trust under Will of Holden, 207 Minn. 211, 218 , .
- In Re Estate of Cooke 292 N.W. 96 Minn. 1940
- Kalscheuer v. Allen 292 N.W. 96 Minn. 1940