Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Marsden, 13 N.W.2d 765.
-
In re: Ratzlaff Family Trust.
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
” In re Marsden’s Estate
-
In re the Estate of Vernon G. Engelkes, Deceased.
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, e.g., Marsden v. Puck (In re Marsden’s Estate), (reversing undue influence finding and holding “nothing unnatural” about testator preferring granddaughter over children “who had shown but little interest in her welfare except to preserve her estate for themselves.”).
- In re Estate of: Alice I. Engman, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
In re Estate of: Alice I. Engman, Decedent.
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Evidence which raises merely a suspicion and shows no more than a motive for exerting and an opportunity to exert undue influence is insufficient proof thereof, though coupled with proof of inequality in the terms of the will.” In re Mardsen’s Estate, 217 Minn. 1, 10
- In Re the Estate of Opsahl 448 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
In Re the Estate of Opsahl
448 N.W.2d 96
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 11-12
- In Re Estate of Overton 417 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
In Re Estate of Overton
417 N.W.2d 653
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(6) Exercise of Influence Undue influence “must operate at the very time the will is made.” In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 9 , (emphasis in original).
- In Re the Estate of Ristau 399 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
In Re the Estate of Ristau
399 N.W.2d 101
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Such influence must overpower the will of the testator and “must operate at the very time the will is made and dominate and control its making.” In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 9
- In Re the Estate of Lange 398 N.W.2d 569 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
In Re the Estate of Lange
398 N.W.2d 569
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 11-12
- Matter of Estate of Rechtzigel 385 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Matter of Estate of Rechtzigel
385 N.W.2d 827
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 201 (quoting In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 11-12 , ).
- Matter of Estate of Anderson 379 N.W.2d 197 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Matter of Estate of Anderson
379 N.W.2d 197
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Although a confidential relationship may be a factor indicating undue influence, any evidence of intimacy or affection between blood relatives “negatives rather than proves undue influence.” In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 11-12
- Gustafson v. Kilgore 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
- In Re Estate of Peterson 168 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1969
-
In Re Estate of Peterson
168 N.W.2d 502
Minn. 1969
In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1, 9 , .
- In Re Estate of Anthony 265 Minn. 382 Minn. 1963
- In Re Estate of Holden 261 Minn. 527 Minn. 1962
- Larsen v. Bjerke 113 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1962
- In Re Estate of Reay 249 Minn. 123 Minn. 1957
- Vangen v. Nelson 69 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1955
- Carlson v. Fredsall 37 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1949
- In Re Estate of Olson 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
- Olson v. Mork 35 N.W.2d 439 Minn. 1948
-
In Re Estate of Olson
35 N.W.2d 439
Minn. 1948
In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , , cited by proponents, and similar cases, are not in point, for the reason, among others, that none of them involved, as does the instant case, a bequest to a beneficiary standing in a confidential relation to the testator and actively participating in the preparation of the will.
- In Re Estate of Wilson 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
- Teschendorf v. Strangeway 27 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1947
-
In Re Estate of Wilson
27 N.W.2d 429
Minn. 1947
In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , ; In re Estate of Stephens, 207 Minn. 597 , 293 N.W.
- Ryan v. Meehan 18 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1945
- Pogue v. Fegan 17 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1944
- In Re Estate of Cunningham 17 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1944
-
In Re Estate of Cunningham
17 N.W.2d 85
Minn. 1944
In In re Estate of Marsden, 217 Minn. 1 , 13 , , 772 , where the execution of the will was challenged and the attorneys who drew it and witnessed it did not take the witness stand, but tried the case for proponent, this court said: "* * * We feel that they would have better served the interests of testatrix, who employed them, by becoming witnesses instead of atto