Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 14 N.W.2d 400.

31 citing documents.

Arianna Anderson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
542, 544 (Minn. 1919) (discussing official immunity with no exception for equitable relief); (same).
Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 931 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 931 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fletcher cites Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley , 217 Minn. 218 , for the proposition that laws impacting property rights implicate a fundamental right.
Ethan Dean v. City of Winona 868 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2015
Kipp v. Sweno 683 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 2004
Kipp v. Sweno 683 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 2004
We have previously noted the general proposition that a person’s “right to occupy [his or her] home is inviolable, irrespective of the meagerness or abundance of [his or her] wealth.” Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 225-26
Lundberg Ex Rel. Lundberg v. Jeep Corp. 582 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Lundberg Ex Rel. Lundberg v. Jeep Corp. 582 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
(quoting Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 225 , ).
In Re Medworth 562 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
In Re Medworth 562 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 224 , see Minn. Const, art. I, §§ 7, 16 (recognizing individual’s right to “life, liberty or property” and providing “The enumeration of rights in this constitution shall not deny or impair others retained by and inherent in the people”).
Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
Women of the State v. Gomez 542 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1995
Davis v. Pierse, 7 Minn. 1 , 6 (1862); accord Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 224-26
State v. Russell 477 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1991
Rico v. State 472 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1991
Rico v. State 472 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1991
6 *109 Although we have imputed knowledge of the law to public officials, Theide v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 231 , it is quite another matter to require public officials to predict changes and developments in the law.
Johnson v. Hunter 447 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1989
Johnson v. Hunter 447 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1989
Analogously, we have stated the right to establish family relations is “inherent and inalienable.” Thiede v. Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 224-25 , (scope of constitutional right of privacy).
State v. Gray 413 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1987
State v. Gray 413 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1987
In Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218 , Justice Streissguth wrote so eloquently: The entire social and political structure of America rests upon the cornerstone that all men have certain rights which are inherent and inalienable.
State v. Cobb 403 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Cobb 403 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See generally Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 224-25 , (discussion of basic rights, privileges and immunities).
Susla v. State 247 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1976
Susla v. State 247 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1976
Johnson v. Callisto, 287 Minn. 61 , Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218 , Wilbrecht v. Babcock, 179 Minn. 263 , Stevens v. North States Motor, Inc. 161 Minn. 345
County of Goodhue v. Rice County 160 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1968
County of Goodhue v. Rice County 160 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1968
Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218 , 14 N. W. (2d) 400 , and In re Settlement of Youngquist, 203 Minn. 530 , .
Erickson v. SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK ASSN., INC. 108 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1961
Erickson v. SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK ASSN., INC. 108 N.W.2d 434 Minn. 1961
5 Moreover, Minn. Const, art. 1, § 2, provides in part: *546 “No member of this State shall be disfranchised, or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land, or the judgment of his peers.” In Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218, 224 , 14 N. W. (2d) 400, 405 , in discussing rights and privileges secured to citizens under Minn. Const, art. 1, § 2, we said: “The entire social and political structure of America rests upon the
Gadach v. Benton County Co-Op Assn. 53 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1952
Gadach v. Benton County Co-Op Assn. 53 N.W.2d 230 Minn. 1952
The complaint, which for present purposes must be regarded as true (Zion E. L. Church v. City of Detroit Lakes, 221 Minn. 55 , 21 N. W. [2d] 203; Polans v. Oreck’s Incorporated, 220 Minn. 249 , 19 N. W. [2d] 435; Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218 , 14 N. W. [2d] 400; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Kelly 15 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1944
State v. Kelly 15 N.W.2d 554 Minn. 1944
Thiede v. Town of Scandia Valley, 217 Minn. 218 , 14 N. W. (2d) 400 .