Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kaehler v. Kaehler, 18 N.W.2d 312.

70 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Beland, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(declining to review an argument not supported by legal authorities); see also, e.g., State, Dep’t of Labor & Indus.
Keith Richard Rossberg v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Keith Richard Rossberg v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 2016
Unsupported claims are forfeited and will not be considered “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” Rossberg, d at 620 (quoting Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537, ).
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Vitamin v. Misha Gordin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-20 (Minn. 2014) (citing Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537, ).
State of Minnesota v. Keith Richard Rossberg 851 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Keith Richard Rossberg 851 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2014
We treat such unsupported claims as waived and do not consider them “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537, accord
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage Of: Wopata v. Wopata 498 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 539
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow 413 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Schultz v. Schultz, 266 Minn. 205 , Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , McDermott v. McDermott, 192 Minn. 32 , 255 N.W.
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Peterson v. Peterson 393 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , the supreme court enunciated the policy clearly: We are of the opinion that the divided custody of a child of such tender years is not desirable.
Brauer v. Brauer 384 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Brauer v. Brauer 384 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 539 , (citing State ex rel.
Bertrand v. API, Inc. 365 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1985
Bertrand v. API, Inc. 365 N.W.2d 222 Minn. 1985
Koppinger v. City of Fairmont, 311 Minn. 186, 189, n. 2 , n. 2 (1976); Pautz v. American Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 241, 251-52 , Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338, 339 , Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537
Horner v. Horner 363 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Horner v. Horner 363 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., French v. French, 236 Minn. 439, 441 , Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 539
Melina v. Chaplin 327 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1982
Melina v. Chaplin 327 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1982
Pautz v. American Insurance Co., 268 Minn. 241, 251-52 , Haugen v. Swanson, 222 Minn. 203, 207 , Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338, 339 , , *21 166 (1946); Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537
Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. 187 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1971
Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. 187 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1971
Knox v. Knox, 222 Minn. 477 , 25 N. W. (2d) 225 ; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
State v. Lipscomb 183 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1971
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Lowe v. Patterson, 265 Minn. 42 , 120 N. W. (2d) 313 .
Pautz v. American Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1964
Pautz v. American Insurance Co. 128 N.W.2d 731 Minn. 1964
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Haugen v. Swanson, 222 Minn. 203 , 23 N. W. (2d) 535 .
Lowe v. Patterson 120 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1963
Lowe v. Patterson 120 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1963
1 Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536, 537 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312, 313 .
Bryant v. Bryant 119 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1963
Bryant v. Bryant 119 N.W.2d 714 Minn. 1963
Wandersee v. Wandersee, 132 Minn. 321 , ; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
Anderson v. Anderson 109 N.W.2d 571 Minn. 1961
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
Stephenson v. Stephenson 104 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1960
Stephenson v. Stephenson 104 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1960
Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 .
Lundin v. Stratmoen 85 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1957
Lundin v. Stratmoen 85 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1957
5 State, by Burnquist, v. Bollenbach, 241 Minn. 103, 124 , 63 N. W. (2d) 278, 291 ; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
HP Droher & Sons v. Toushin 85 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1957
HP Droher & Sons v. Toushin 85 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1957
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
MacWhinney v. MacWhinney 79 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1956
MacWhinney v. MacWhinney 79 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 1956
4 Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .
Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
2 Shepstedt v. Hayes, 221 Minn. 74 , 21 N. W. (2d) 199 ; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Kugling v. Williamson, 231 Minn. 135 , 42 N. W. (2d) 534 .
Lammi v. Lammi 70 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1955
Lammi v. Lammi 70 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 1955
Their welfare being of paramount consideration (French v. French, 236 Minn. 439 , 53 N. W. [2d] 215; Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. [2d] 312), we must hold the trial court erred in depriving defendant of their continued custody and that its order of August 31, 1954, to such effect must be reversed.
State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
French v. French 53 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1952
Kugling v. Williamson 42 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1950
Kugling v. Williamson 42 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1950
Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 .