Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Longyear Holding Co., 29 N.W.2d 657.
- In the Matter of: Petition of MCEA for Minn. 2022
-
Save Lake Calhoun,
Minn. 2020
1 (2018), “in trust for the people of the state,”
- White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. 928 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.
928 N.W.2d 351
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
849 (Minn. App. 2015) (quoting State v. Longyear Holding Co. , 224 Minn. 451 , , 669-70 (1947) ).
- Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 859 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
859 N.W.2d 845
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Longyear Holding Co., 224 Minn. 451, 472-73 , -70 (1947) (quotation omitted).
- Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 546 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1996
-
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin
546 N.W.2d 10
Minn. 1996
As a general rule, riparian land made by avulsion does not change the underlying ownership, State v. Longyear Holding Co., 224 Minn. 451 , Hanson v. Rice, 88 Mnn.
- Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin 533 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Reads Landing Campers Ass'n v. Township of Pepin
533 N.W.2d 45
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The dissent contends that the land created by dredging the Mississippi River near Reads Landing is the property of the state because the dredging was a sudden and artificial change in the shoreline and, under State v. Longyear Holding Co., 224 Minn. 451, 467 , the doctrine of accretions and relictions does not apply when a change is sudden and artificial.
- Pratt v. State, Department of Natural Resources 309 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1981
-
Pratt v. State, Department of Natural Resources
309 N.W.2d 767
Minn. 1981
1139, 1143 (1893); and see Herschman v. State, 303 Minn. 50 , State v. Longyear Holding Co., 224 Minn. 451, 478
- Herschman v. State, Department of Natural Resources 225 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1975
-
Herschman v. State, Department of Natural Resources
225 N.W.2d 841
Minn. 1975
Such reasoning was strongly reaffirmed in State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451, 468 , certiorari denied, 336 U. S. 948 , 69 S. Ct. 884 , 93 L. ed. 1104 (1949).
- State v. Slotness 185 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1971
-
State v. Slotness
185 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 1971
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657 , upon which the state places principal reliance, is not authority for the state’s position.
- Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
-
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout
124 N.W.2d 328
Minn. 1963
Navigability, when asserted as the basis of a right arising under the Constitution of the United States, is necessarily a question of federal law to be determined according to the general rule recognized and applied in the federal courts.” Following the Holt case the question came before this court in State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451, 458 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657, 662 , where this court said: “It is well settled that the test of navigability to fix ownership of lake beds must be determined
- State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
-
State v. Adams
89 N.W.2d 661
Minn. 1957
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657 ; Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Min.
- State v. Bollenbach 63 N.W.2d 278 Minn. 1954
-
State v. Bollenbach
63 N.W.2d 278
Minn. 1954
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657 ; Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Min.
- Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co. 54 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1952
-
Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.
54 N.W.2d 912
Minn. 1952
United States v. Holt State Bank, 270 U. S. 49 , 46 S. Ct. 197 , 70 L. ed. 465; State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657 .
- State v. Longyear Holding Co. 35 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
-
State v. Longyear Holding Co.
35 N.W.2d 291
Minn. 1948
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 224 Minn. 451 , 29 N. W. (2d) 657 .