Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Duenow v. Lindeman, 27 N.W.2d 421.

54 citing documents.

City of Plymouth v. Hildania Kristensen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
City of Plymouth v. Hildania Kristensen Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“[A] natural right to flowage or drainage is not a true easement.
Teresa M. Hintze, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Marriage of: Bryan Larry Lovas, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(stating that “[c] ourts will relieve parties from the consequences of the neglect or mistak es of their attorney, [sic] when it can be done without substantial prejudice to their adversaries”) (citations omitted); Nguyen v. State Farm Mut.
James Aeshliman, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
Sampair v. Village of Birchwood 784 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 2010
Accordingly, that question is not before us. Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 512 , (“After all, parties to a lawsuit do not become subject to the court’s power for all purposes, but only to the extent that judicial power is invoked by the issues raised to decide the particular questions such issues present for decision.”).
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 758 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 758 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 518 , (reversing order denying motion to vacate judgment because “plain and decisive facts were entirely overlooked by the trial judge”).
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin 744 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin 744 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-32 (Minn.2004) (evaluating district court’s discretionary ruling on motion to vacate default judgment); Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 518 , (reversing order denying motion to vacate because “plain and decisive facts were entirely overlooked by the trial judge”).
Ladwig v. Chatters 623 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Ladwig v. Chatters 623 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cf. Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 517 , (finding the trial court “clearly departed from the complaint” by awarding “relief for which there is no basis therein”); Beliveau v. Beliveau, 217 Minn. 235, 245 , (“A court of equity has the power to adapt its decree to the exigencies of each particular case
McClellan v. Goldberg 568 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
McClellan v. Goldberg 568 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., (“Our case law reflects a strong policy favoring the granting of relief when judgment is entered through no fault of the client”); (“ordinarily courts are loath .to ‘punish’ the innocent client for the counsel’s neglect”); Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 518 , (“Courts will relieve parties from the consequences of the neglect or mistake of their attorney, when it can be done without substantial prejudice to their adversaries.”).
Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1997
Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 1997
See Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 518 , (“Courts will relieve parties from the consequences of the neglect or mistake of their attorney, [sic] when it can be done without substantial prejudice to their adversaries.”) (citations omitted).
Kral v. Boesch 557 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Kral v. Boesch 557 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 513-14 , (explaining that the.
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Cohen v. Little Six, Inc. 543 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 511 , (quoting Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169, 172 , 112 N.W.
Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium Project 529 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Duenow v. Lindeman , 223 Minn. 505 , 511 , , 425 (Minn. 1947) (quoting Sache v. Wallace , 101 Minn. 169 , 172 , 112 N.W.
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. Morse 451 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 510
Nelson v. Siebert 411 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Siebert 411 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 518 , (citations omitted).
Kurak v. Control Data Corp. 410 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kurak v. Control Data Corp. 410 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505, 518
Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1977
Layne Minnesota Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1977
Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 1B Dunnell, Dig.
Morton v. Board of Com'rs of Ramsey County 223 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1974
Morton v. Board of Com'rs of Ramsey County 223 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1974
Co. 225 Minn. 508 , Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505
Tourville v. Tourville 198 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1972
Tourville v. Tourville 198 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1972
Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , Holen v. M.A.C.
Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 152 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1967
Stephenson v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 152 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1967
348; Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 ; Dockendorf v. Lakie, 240 Minn. 441 , 61 N. W. (2d) 752 .
Levine v. Holdahl-Colstad, Inc. 88 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1958
Levine v. Holdahl-Colstad, Inc. 88 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1958
He relies upon Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N.W.
Liberopulos v. Chopis 73 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1955
Liberopulos v. Chopis 73 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 1955
Lohman v. Edgewater Holding Co. 227 Minn. 40 , 33 N. W. (2d) 842 ; Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 .
Nyberg v. Cambridge State Bank 72 N.W.2d 345 Minn. 1955
Dockendorf v. Lakie 61 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1953
Dockendorf v. Lakie 61 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 1953
8 Pilney v. Funk, 212 Minn. 398 , 3 N. W. (2d) 792 ; Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Dix v. Harris Machinery Co. 60 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 ; Duluth, M. & N. Ry.
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue Earth 47 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1951
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. County of Blue Earth 47 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 1951
For recent application of the rule of the Sheehan case, see Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 , and Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , 32 N. W. (2d) 286 .
Heirs of Rood v. Gibas 38 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1949
Heirs of Rood v. Gibas 38 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1949
348; Duenow v. Lindeman, 223 Minn. 505 , 27 N. W. (2d) 421 ; M. S. A. 548.01; 3 Dunnell, Dig.