Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 31 N.W.2d 660.

39 citing documents.

Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County Minn. 2026
Theodore Lockhart, Sr., Relator v. Hennepin County Minn. 2026
real estate tax grievances determined.” Land O’
A19-1878 Minn. 2021
Odunlade v. City of Minneapolis 823 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2012
Odunlade v. City of Minneapolis 823 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2012
of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 549 , (holding that when a claim is covered by Minn.Stat.
Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns 710 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 2006
Kmart Corp. v. County of Stearns 710 N.W.2d 761 Minn. 2006
(quoting Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Sebeka Village, 225 Minn. 540, 548 , ).
Kmart Corp. v. County of Becker 639 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 2002
Kmart Corp. v. County of Becker 639 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 2002
Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 548
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 633 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2001
Explained Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 633 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 2001
The counties rely primarily on Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, where we said: “[W]hen the legislature enacted [chapter 278], it did so for the purpose of providing a rather simple remedy for the taxpayer to have his real estate grievances determined * * 225 Minn. 540, 548-49
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNOR 602 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 548
BFW CO. v. County of Ramsey 566 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1997
BFW CO. v. County of Ramsey 566 N.W.2d 702 Minn. 1997
(quoting Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 548 , ).
Hirsch v. Bartley-Lindsay Co. 537 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1995
Hirsch v. Bartley-Lindsay Co. 537 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1995
Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Sebeka Village, 225 Minn. 540 , , cert.
Gadey v. City of Minneapolis 517 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Gadey v. City of Minneapolis 517 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Krahl, d at 544 (citing Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 548 , (holding that chapter 555 did not provide alternate remedy to chapter 278’s provisions for appeal of real estate taxes), cert.
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue 470 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue 470 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , , cert.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 451 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1990
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin 451 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1990
Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 546-49 , -65 (1948).
Krahl v. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 283 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Krahl v. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 283 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1979
Fichtner v. Schiller, 271 Minn. 263 , Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , , cert, denied, 334 U.S. 844 , 68 S.Ct.
Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1977
Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1977
The court explained the overall purpose of § 278.01 in Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 548, , certiorari denied, 334 U.S. 844 , 68 S.Ct.
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk 222 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1974
Village of Burnsville v. Onischuk 222 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1974
Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540, 547 , , certiorari denied, 334 U. S. 844 , 68 S. Ct. 1513 , 92 L. ed. 1768 (1948).
Commissioner of Taxation v. Crow Wing County 144 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1966
Commissioner of Taxation v. Crow Wing County 144 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1966
the collection of such taxes, and for an order requiring the defendants, or either of them, to correct the levy, and for such other order as may be proper for the correction and adjustment of such taxes and levy, notwithstanding that such taxpayers have a speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” 8 See, Fichtner v. Schiller, supra„ and Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , 31 N. W. (2d) 660 , certiorari denied, 334 U. S. 844 , 68 S. Ct. 1513 , 92 L. ed. 17
Fichtner v. Schiller 135 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1965
Fichtner v. Schiller 135 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1965
Wall v. Borgen, supra; Rosso v. Village of *266 Brooklyn Center, 214 Minn. 364 , 8 N. W. (2d) 219 ; Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , 31 N. W. (2d) 660 , certiorari denied, 334 U. S. 844 , 68 S. Ct. 1513 , 92 L. ed. 1768; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809 ; Larson v. Freeborn County, 267 Minn. 383 , 126 N. W. (2d) 771 .
Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
Adelman v. Onischuk 135 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1965
The Rosso decision was cited and approved in [Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , 31 N. W. (2d) 660 ] and more recently in Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 100 , 119 N. W. (2d) 809, 819 , where we.stated: “ ‘The authorities generally indicate that relief against erroneous or illegal assessments will not be granted by a court of equity, if the property owner has an adequate remedy at law.
Larson v. Freeborn County 126 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1964
Larson v. Freeborn County 126 N.W.2d 771 Minn. 1964
Although we made no mention of Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Center, 214 Minn. 364 , 8 N. W. (2d) 219 , and Land O’Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , 31 N. W. (2d) 660 , certiorari denied, 334 U. S. 844 , 68 S. Ct. 1513 , 92 L. ed. 1768, but relied on the Johnson case in allowing a collateral attack where the statutory review prescribed by § 106.631 was not invoked, our disposition resulted in actually denying the injunction.
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena 39 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1949
Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of Wadena 39 N.W.2d 164 Minn. 1949
Land O’ Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of Sebeka, 225 Minn. 540 , 31 N. W. (2d) 660 .