Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mattfeld v. Nester, 32 N.W.2d 291.
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd. 261 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 1977
-
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.
261 N.W.2d 581
Minn. 1977
In Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , we upheld a trial court’s postverdict reception of a certified copy of letters of special administration in a wrongful death action.
- Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co. 208 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1973
-
Bernloehr v. Central Livestock Order Buying Co.
208 N.W.2d 753
Minn. 1973
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106
- Bastianson v. Forschen 196 N.W.2d 451 Minn. 1972
-
Bastianson v. Forschen
196 N.W.2d 451
Minn. 1972
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 131
- Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Co. v. Benson 195 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1972
-
Minnesota Mutual Fire and Casualty Co. v. Benson
195 N.W.2d 446
Minn. 1972
1 Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106
- Patterson v. Donahue 190 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 1971
-
Patterson v. Donahue
190 N.W.2d 864
Minn. 1971
3 See, Sroga v. Lund, 259 Minn. 269, 271 , Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 130
- Bachman v. Lieser 184 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1971
-
Bachman v. Lieser
184 N.W.2d 11
Minn. 1971
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 131 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 307 .
- Kempf v. Kempf 179 N.W.2d 715 Minn. 1970
-
Kempf v. Kempf
179 N.W.2d 715
Minn. 1970
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 .
- Martz v. Revier 170 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1969
-
Martz v. Revier
170 N.W.2d 83
Minn. 1969
R. Co. 98 Minn. 296 , ; Jenson v. Glemaker, 195 Minn. 556 , ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Shumway v. Nelson, 259 Minn. 319 , 107 N. W. (2d) 531 ; Hondl v. Chicago G. W. Ry.
- Kantar v. West End Air Conditioning Co. 144 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1966
-
Kantar v. West End Air Conditioning Co.
144 N.W.2d 592
Minn. 1966
In Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 118 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 301 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, this court, in following the Dahl case, said in discussing right-of-way when observation is obstructed: “* * * The right-of-way rule is a relative one; whether it was violated depends on circumstances and usually is a fact question for the jury.
- Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
-
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc.
135 N.W.2d 886
Minn. 1965
Concerning the cross-examination of witnesses, this court in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 126 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 305 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, 925, said: “Generally, a wide range of inquiry should be allowed on cross-examination.
- DeCourcy v. Trustees of the Westminster Presbyterian Church, Inc. 134 N.W.2d 326 Minn. 1965
-
DeCourcy v. Trustees of the Westminster Presbyterian Church, Inc.
134 N.W.2d 326
Minn. 1965
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Restatement, Torts, §§ 431, 432(2).
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle 122 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1963
-
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of Isle
122 N.W.2d 36
Minn. 1963
Normally, the husband’s liability for such expenses incurred in his wife’s behalf is regarded as an injury to property, Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 132 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 308 , but here no award for injury to property was made to plaintiff.
- State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
-
State v. Smith
119 N.W.2d 838
Minn. 1962
A wrongdoer is liable for all the consequences which he intended to bring about by his wrongful act and which in fact resulted therefrom.” In Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 124 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 304 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, 924, this court stated: “It may be generally stated that an injury is held to be the proximate cause of death where disease intervened, when it is shown that the injury caused the disease from which death resulted; or, if the injury did not cause the disease, that i
- Holtz v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 117 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1962
-
Holtz v. Mutual Service Casualty Co.
117 N.W.2d 767
Minn. 1962
Plaintiff advances as an alternative theory for recovery the provisions of the policy by which defendant assumes liability for property damage, citing Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 184 Minn. 82 , , 78 A. L. R. 589; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; and Thompson v. Town of Ft.
- Wagenhals v. Flint 114 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1962
-
Wagenhals v. Flint
114 N.W.2d 641
Minn. 1962
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 119 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 301 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106, 110 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290, 292 ; Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163, 171 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649, 655 .
- Powers v. Eddy's Baking Co. 112 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1961
-
Powers v. Eddy's Baking Co.
112 N.W.2d 625
Minn. 1961
Paul, 219 Minn. 87 , 16 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Weller v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 239 Minn. 298 , 58 N. W. (2d) 739 .
- Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co. 111 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1961
-
Overruled
Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co.
111 N.W.2d 461
Minn. 1961
In Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 135 , 32 N.W.
- Erickson v. Strickler 90 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1958
-
Erickson v. Strickler
90 N.W.2d 232
Minn. 1958
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 124 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 304 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
- Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 82 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1957
-
Hondl v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
82 N.W.2d 245
Minn. 1957
The railroad company contends that this instruction was erroneous and points out that under Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, the court held that, where the negligence of one of several beneficiaries contributed to the death, recovery in an action for wrongful death may be denied to the extent that it would inure to the benefit of the one guilty of the contributory negligence and that ( 226 Minn. 13
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 80 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1956
-
Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.
80 N.W.2d 30
Minn. 1956
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
- State v. Anderson 78 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1956
-
State v. Anderson
78 N.W.2d 320
Minn. 1956
It is true that whether a cautionary instruction should be given ordinarily rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; State v. Jenkins, 171 Minn. 173 , , but in a situation such as that presented here, it would seem that a failure to give such an instruction constituted material error.
- Jablinske v. Eckstrom 76 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1956
-
Jablinske v. Eckstrom
76 N.W.2d 654
Minn. 1956
7 Schleuder v. Soltow, 239 Minn. 453 , 59 N. W. (2d) 320 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn. 91 , 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Johnston v. Jordan, 193 Minn. 298 , ; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
- Swigerd v. City of Ortonville 75 N.W.2d 217 Minn. 1956
-
Swigerd v. City of Ortonville
75 N.W.2d 217
Minn. 1956
Paul, 219 Minn. 87 , 16 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Saaf v. Duluth Police Pension Relief Assn. 240 Minn. 60, 65 , 59 N. W. (2d) 883, 886 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
- Heise v. the JR Clark Co. 71 N.W.2d 818 Minn. 1955
-
Heise v. the JR Clark Co.
71 N.W.2d 818
Minn. 1955
Co. 214 Minn. 436 , 8 N. W. (2d) 471 ; Kane v. Locke, 218 Minn. 486 , 16 N. W. (2d) 545 , affirming 216 Minn. 170 , 12 N. W. (2d) 495 ; Christenson v. Village of Hibbing, 219 Minn. 141 , 16 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Ellingboe v. Guerin, 228 Minn. 211 , 36 N. W. (2d) 598 ; Rogge v. G. N. Ry.
- Kolatz v. Kelly 69 N.W.2d 649 Minn. 1955
-
Kolatz v. Kelly
69 N.W.2d 649
Minn. 1955
Co. 230 Minn. 393 , 41 N. W. (2d) 804 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Demmer v. Grunke, supra.