DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mattfeld v. Nester, 32 N.W.2d 291.

135 citing documents.

  • Johnson v. Mancilman 63 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1954
  • Johnson v. Mancilman 63 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1954
    Co. 230 Minn. 393 , 41 N. W. (2d) 804 ; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 .
  • Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American Legion 62 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1954
  • Smith v. Otto Hendrickson Post 212, American Legion 62 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1954
    Co. 214 Minn. 436 , 8 N. W. (2d) 471 ; Kane v. Locke, 218 Minn. 486 , 16 N. W. (2d) 545 , affirming Kane v. Locke, 216 Minn. 170 , 12 N. W. (2d) 495 ; Christenson v. Village of Hibbing, 219 Minn. 141 , 16 N. W. (2d) 881 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Ellingboe v. Guerin, 228 Minn. 211 , 36 N. W. (2d) 598 ; Rogge v. G. N. Ry.
  • Weller v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1953
  • Weller v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 58 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1953
    Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
  • Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 57 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1953
  • Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 57 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1953
    He urges that the facts in this case required, and the law permitted, a full and complete cross-examination, citing as authority, among other cases, Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
  • Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ellsworth 54 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1952
  • Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ellsworth 54 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1952
    Damrow v. Zauner, 236 Minn. 447 , 53 N. W. (2d) 139 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Schaedler v. New York L. Ins.
  • Damrow v. Zauner 53 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1952
  • Damrow v. Zauner 53 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1952
    4 Flennning v. Thorson, 231 Minn. 343 , 43 N. W. (2d) 225 ; Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
  • Webber v. Seymour 51 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1952
  • Webber v. Seymour 51 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1952
    See, also, Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, in which it was held that it is the duty of the driver of an automobile approaching from the left to yield the right of way to one approaching from the right where they approach an intersection under such circumstances that if both continue at the speeds at which they are tra
  • Bohnen v. Gorr 47 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1951
  • Bohnen v. Gorr 47 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1951
    Plaintiff seeks to bring this case within the rule of Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 119 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 302 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, where, on account of a knoll on the highway, it was not possible to see any appreciable distance down the highway.
  • Bellman v. Posnick 46 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
  • Bellman v. Posnick 46 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1951
    2 Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N. W. (2d) 883 , has been cited with approval in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Foster v. Bock, 229 Minn. 428 , 39 N. W. (2d) 862 ; Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 ; and Halloran v. Tousignant, 230 Minn. 399 , 41 N. W. (2d) 874
  • Flemming v. Thorson 43 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1950
  • Flemming v. Thorson 43 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1950
    Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; 6 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Goede v. Rondorf 43 N.W.2d 770 Minn. 1950
  • Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
  • Halloran v. Tousignant 41 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1950
    The rule of the Moore case has been applied in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Martin v. Reibel, 227 Minn. 106 , 34 N. W. (2d) 290 ; Bosell v. Ran-nestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 ; Foster v. Bock, 229 Minn. 428 , 39 N. W. (2d) 862 ; and Ristau v. Riley, 230 Minn. 341 , 41 N. W. (2d) 772 .
  • Rose v. Western States Life Insurance 41 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1950
  • Rose v. Western States Life Insurance 41 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1950
    What was said in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 119 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 301 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909, following Dahl v. Collette, 206 Minn. 601 , , is applicable here.
  • Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
  • Ristau v. Riley 41 N.W.2d 772 Minn. 1950
    We applied the rule of the Moore case in subsequent cases such as Foster v. Bock, 229 Minn. 428 , 39 N. W. (2d) 862 , and Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
  • Rampi v. Vevea 38 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1949
  • Perry v. Reuter 38 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1949
  • Rampi v. Vevea 38 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1949
    Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 82 N. W. (2d) 291 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909; Bosell v. Rannestad, 226 Minn. 413 , 33 N. W. (2d) 40 .
  • Perry v. Reuter 38 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1949
    Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 136 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 310 , 3 A. L. R. (2d) 909.
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
    In Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 119 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291, 301 , we said: “* * * Ordinarily, where the defendant is out of sight of the driver crossing an intersection, as where defendant is behind an obstruction or in a dip of the road and it appears to plaintiff as a result of observation that it is safe to cross and would be but for defendant’s un
  • Bosell v. Rannestad 33 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1948
  • Bosell v. Rannestad 33 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1948
    This definition was followed in Delyea v. Goossen, 226 Minn. 91 , 32 N. W. (2d) 179 , and again in Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , 32 N. W. (2d) 291 .