Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeZeler, 41 N.W.2d 313.
-
State v. Jobe
486 N.W.2d 407
Minn. 1992
The standard for the admissibility of photographs was set by this court in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , where we said: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything for which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description * * * provided they are relevant to some material issue; and they are
- State v. Hummel 483 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 1992
-
State v. Hummel
483 N.W.2d 68
Minn. 1992
(emphasis in original) (quoting State v. De Zeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , ).
- State v. Olson 459 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Olson
459 N.W.2d 711
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. De Zeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47
- State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Drieman
457 N.W.2d 703
Minn. 1990
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , established the standard for admitting photographs: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided t
- State v. Borden 455 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Borden
455 N.W.2d 482
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-86 (Minn.1982); State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 47
- State v. Morrison 437 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
State v. Morrison
437 N.W.2d 422
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-86 (Minn.1982) (citing State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , ).
- State v. Olson 436 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
State v. Olson
436 N.W.2d 817
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
403; State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 40
- State v. Alton 432 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1988
-
State v. Alton
432 N.W.2d 754
Minn. 1988
The standard for admission of photographs was set out in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , : *758 Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are relevant to some material i
- State v. Gurske 424 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Gurske
424 N.W.2d 300
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , 41 N.W.
- State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
State v. Jurgens
424 N.W.2d 546
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
- VanHercke v. Eastvold 405 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
VanHercke v. Eastvold
405 N.W.2d 902
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Moeller v. Hauser, 237 Minn. 368, 384 , (quoting State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , ).
- State v. Erdman 383 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Erdman
383 N.W.2d 331
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 40
- State v. Sanders 376 N.W.2d 196 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Sanders
376 N.W.2d 196
Minn. 1985
In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , we stated: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are relevant to some mate
- State v. Johnson 374 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Johnson
374 N.W.2d 285
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
- State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Durfee
322 N.W.2d 778
Minn. 1982
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
- Schleret v. State 311 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1981
- State v. Berry 309 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Berry
309 N.W.2d 777
Minn. 1981
The photographs defendant challenges accurately portray the scene of the events in question and thus meet the requirements of State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47
- State v. Gibbons 305 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Gibbons
305 N.W.2d 331
Minn. 1981
See State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
- State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Wahlberg
296 N.W.2d 408
Minn. 1980
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52
- State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Clark
296 N.W.2d 359
Minn. 1980
In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46-47 , we stated the rule as follows: Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are r
- State v. Larson 281 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Larson
281 N.W.2d 481
Minn. 1979
See, State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
- State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Fossen
282 N.W.2d 496
Minn. 1979
In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 49 , this court articulated the standard for determining whether such experimental evidence is admissible: “ * * * The performance of experiments in the presence of the jury, or the admission of evidence of experiments performed out of the presence of the jury, when they are made under cond
- State v. Carlson 264 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1978
-
State v. Carlson
264 N.W.2d 639
Minn. 1978
See, also, McNab v. Jeppesen, 258 Minn. 15 , State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
- State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
-
State v. Martin
261 N.W.2d 341
Minn. 1977
The admission of photographs of a homicide victim’s body is governed by the standard enunciated in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , , 15 A.L.R.2d 1137 (1950).
- Young v. Wlazik 262 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 1977
-
Young v. Wlazik
262 N.W.2d 300
Minn. 1977
State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
- State v. Bott 246 N.W.2d 48 Minn. 1976
-
State v. Bott
246 N.W.2d 48
Minn. 1976
In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , , 15 A. L. R. 2d 1137 (1950), we considered a similar challenge to the admissibility of demonstrative evidence, in that case photographs of a corpse.