DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeZeler, 41 N.W.2d 313.

161 citing documents.

  • Orwick v. Belshan 231 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1975
  • Orwick v. Belshan 231 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 1975
    State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230 , State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 7A Dunnell, Dig.
  • State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • Moteberg v. Johnson 210 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1973
  • Moteberg v. Johnson 210 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1973
    See, State v. Tinklenberg, 292 Minn. 271 , State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • Lemieux v. Bishop 209 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1973
  • Lemieux v. Bishop 209 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1973
    They must be squared, the squares added and the square root of the sum of the squares taken.” 9 The trial judge, in accordance with the general rule that there must exist at the time of the experiment or test conditions substantially similar to those existing at the time of the accident (State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , [1950]; Annotation, 78 A. L. R. 2d 152, 158), also determined that such conditions existed when Brenna conducted his six test runs.
  • State v. Loss 204 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Loss 204 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1973
    The applicable rule to determine the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence was set forth originally in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , which held that circumstantial evidence will support a conviction only where the facts described by it— “* * * form a complete chain which, in the light of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the accused as to exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, any reasonable
  • State v. Fassler 503 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Martin 197 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 1972
    Co. 183 Minn. 384 , State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39
  • State v. Tinklenberg 194 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Tinklenberg 194 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1972
    The rule with regard to pictures offered in evidence was set out in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46 , : “* * * Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or where they are helpful as an aid to a verbal description of objects and conditions, provided they are relevant to some material
  • State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Johnson 192 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1971
    State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 234 , State v. De-Zeler, 230 Minn. 39, 49
  • State v. Darrow 177 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Darrow 177 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1970
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 49 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313, 320 , this court stated that in both criminal and civil proceedings the “performance of experiments in the presence of the jury, or the admission of evidence of experiments performed out of the presence of the jury, when they are made under conditions and circumstances substantially similar to
  • State v. Lundstrom 171 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Lundstrom 171 N.W.2d 718 Minn. 1969
    as to all the other elements of the crime, is entirely circumstantial, and circumstantial evidence will support a conviction only where the facts disclosed by it— “* * * form a complete chain which, in the light of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the accused as to exclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, any reasonable inference other than that of guilt * * State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313, 322 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137, 1150; State v. Beilke, 267 Minn.
  • State v. Daml 162 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Daml 162 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1968
    The point thus raised is disposed of by prior holdings of this court in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137, and State v. Taylor, 270 Minn. 333 , 133 N. W. (2d) 828 .
  • State v. DeSchoatz 157 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1968
  • State v. DeSchoatz 157 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1968
    See, State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137.
  • State v. Steeves 157 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Steeves 157 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1968
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 46 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313, 319 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137, 1147, this court addressed itself to the question of the admissibility of photographs in a murder trial: “* * * Photographs are admissible as competent evidence where they accurately portray anything which it is competent for a witness to describe in words, or wher
  • State v. Perry 142 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Perry 142 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1966
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137; State v. Kolander, 236 Minn. 209 , 52 N. W. (2d) 458 ; LeFevre v. State, 242 Wis.
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
  • State v. Thompson 139 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1966
    Our attention has been called to five decisions in which we have considered similar questions, namely, State v. Williams, 96 Minn. 351 , ; State v. Lilja, 155 Minn. 251 , ; State v. Soltau, 212 Minn. 20 , 2 N. W. (2d) 155 ; State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137; and Gruenhagen v. Brelje, 252 Minn. 203 , 89 N. W. (2d) 738 .
  • State v. Taylor 133 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1965
  • State v. Taylor 133 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1965
    9 See, State v. Rasmussen, 241 Minn. 310 , 63 N. W. (2d) 1 ; State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137; State v. Soltau, 212 Minn. 20 , 2 N. W. (2d) 155 ; State v. Jenkins, 171 Minn 173, ; State v. Sailor, 130 Minn. 84 , ; State v. Newman, 127 Minn. 445 , .
  • State v. Beilke 127 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Beilke 127 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 1964
    In State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 52 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313, 322 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137, 1150, this court recognized that circumstantial evidence is sufficient to support a conviction when the facts disclosed by such circumstantial evidence— “* * * form a complete chain which, in light of the evidence as a whole, leads so directly to the guilt of the a
  • State v. Garden 125 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Garden 125 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1963
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137.
  • State, by Lord v. Winiecki 115 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1962
  • State, by Lord v. Winiecki 115 N.W.2d 724 Minn. 1962
    In support of the trial court’s reception of this evidence, the state relies upon certain well-established principles which were expressed in State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39, 45 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313, 318 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137, as follows: “* * * Did defendant by his cross-examination open the door to its admission when it [coroner’s death certificate] would otherwise have been inadmissible?
  • State v. Hilliard 359 P.2d 66 Ariz. 1961
  • State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
  • State v. Keaton 104 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 1960
    13 The instruction objected to was as follows: “Every homicide is presumed unlawful, so that when the mere act of killing is proved, without any more being shown, the killing is presumed to be intentional and malicious and prompted by the ordinary and natural operations of the mind.” 14 State v. Billington, 241 Minn. 418 , 63 N. W. (2d) 387 ; State v. De-Zeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137.
  • McNab v. Jeppesen 102 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1960
  • McNab v. Jeppesen 102 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1960
    (3 ed.) § 7193; State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. *19 W. (2d) 313, 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137; 1 Wigmore, Evidence (3 ed.) § 15.
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Wolkoff 85 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1957
  • State Ex Rel. Clark v. Wolkoff 85 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1957
    13 State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137; see, Van Brunt v. Greaves, 32 Minn. 68 , .
  • State v. Polan 293 P.2d 931 Ariz. 1956
  • Burns v. Kvernstoen 74 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1955
  • Burns v. Kvernstoen 74 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1955
    State v. DeZeler, 230 Minn. 39 , 41 N. W. (2d) 313 , 15 A. L. R. (2d) 1137; State v. Soltau, 212 Minn. 20 , 2 N. W. (2d) 155 ; Oswald v. Minneapolis & N. W. Ry.
  • Hardy v. Anderson 63 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1954