Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556, 35 N.W.2d 337.

44 citing documents.

In the Matter of a Petition for Clarification or Amendment of Appropriate Unit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
No. 556, (Minn. 9 Respondents also assert that AFSCME forfeited its argument relying on the NLRB cases because it did not cite them in its posthearing brief.
Theresa M. Anderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Local No. 556, which states that “[i]n the absence of proof to the contrary, it is presumed that mail properly addressed and posted, with postage prepaid, is duly received by the addressee.” We agree with this analysis.
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Scott 530 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of Scott 530 N.W.2d 218 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Bd., 227 Minn. 263, 270
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of Mower 469 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of Mower 469 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Bd., 227 Minn. 263, 270 , (analyzing relationship between NLRA and PELRA’s predecessor statute).
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Tufte 435 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Travelers Insurance Co. v. Tufte 435 N.W.2d 824 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board & Hotel & Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263, 265
Liptak v. State Ex Rel. City of New Hope 340 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Weisman 340 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Weisman 340 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State v. Hartman, 261 Minn. 314 , Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , Nemo v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263
Liptak v. State Ex Rel. City of New Hope 340 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State v. Hartman, 261 Minn. 314 , Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , Nemo v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263
Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety 268 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1978
Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public Safety 268 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1978
Cf. Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263
Nafstad v. Merchant 228 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
Minnesota State College Board v. Public Employment Relations Board 228 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1975
Minn. St. College Bd. v. PUBLIC EMP. REL. BD. 228 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1975
Minnesota State College Board v. Public Employment Relations Board 228 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1975
PERB relies upon this court’s determination in Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , that : “While care must be exercised in using decisions of the National Labor Relations Board as authority in construing our act [Minn. Labor Relations Act, Minn. St.
Minn. St. College Bd. v. PUBLIC EMP. REL. BD. 228 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1975
PERB relies upon this court's determination in Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , that: "While care must be exercised in using decisions of the National Labor Relations Board as authority in construing our act [Minn. Labor Relations Act, Minn.St.
Nafstad v. Merchant 228 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263, 266 , 811 (1948); 7A Dunnell, Dig.
Wasmund v. Nunamaker 151 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1967
Wasmund v. Nunamaker 151 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1967
1 See, Weidel v. Plummer, 243 Minn. 476 , 68 N. W. (2d) 245 ; Craigmile v. Sorenson, 241 Minn. 222 , 62 N. W. (2d) 846 ; Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. INC. v. Lauer's, Inc. 119 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1962
GRIGGS, COOPER & CO. INC. v. Lauer's, Inc. 119 N.W.2d 850 Minn. 1962
227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
Richfield Federation of Teachers v. Richfield Education Ass'n 115 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 1962
Richfield Federation of Teachers v. Richfield Education Ass'n 115 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 1962
In this conclusion we are supported by our decision in Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 .
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810 109 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810 109 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1961
1 See, Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Sheehan v. District Court 93 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Sheehan v. District Court 93 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
See, Weidel v. Plummer, 243 Minn. 476 , 68 N. W. (2d) 245 ; Craigmile v. Sorenson, 241 Minn. 222 , 62 N. W. (2d) 846 ; Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
Thomas v. Ramberg 60 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1953
Thomas v. Ramberg 60 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1953
11 J. F. Quest Foundry Co. v. International M. & F. W. Union, 216 Minn. 436 , 13 N. W. (2d) 32 ; see, Nemo v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 .
State ex rel. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW-CIO, Local 1174 v. … 53 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1952
State ex rel. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW-CIO, Local 1174 v. … 53 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1952
See, Nemo v. Hotel & Restaurant Employes’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263, 272 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; M. S. A. 587.05.
State ex rel. Stenstrom v. Wilson 48 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1951
State ex rel. Stenstrom v. Wilson 48 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 1951
See, Nemo v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263, 273 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 .
State ex rel. Adent v. Industrial Commission 48 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1951
State ex rel. Adent v. Industrial Commission 48 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1951
Nemo v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263, 273 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; M. S. A. 587.05.
Bellows v. Ericson 46 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1951
Bellows v. Ericson 46 N.W.2d 654 Minn. 1951
3 Juster v. Grossman, 229 Minn. 280 , 38 N. W. (2d) 832 ; Nemo v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America 46 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1950
Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North America 46 N.W.2d 94 Minn. 1950
In Nemo v. Hotel & Bestaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263, 267 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 340 , where we restated the three essentials that will justify issuance of a writ of prohibition, we said: “3.
Juster v. Grossman 38 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1949
Juster v. Grossman 38 N.W.2d 832 Minn. 1949
*288 Roberts v. Hense, 185 Minn. 99 , ; Nemo v. Hotel, etc., Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by