Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Meyer, 37 N.W.2d 3.

42 citing documents.

Minn. 2020
(“[I]t is the legislature that defines the conduct that constitutes a criminal offense and fixes the punishment.”); State v. Meyer , (“The legislature can, and always has, fixed and determined the punishment that shall be imposed for a violation of law and the limits of discretion vested in the courts in the imposition of the sentence.”).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
–18 (Minn. 1982); see also State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 293– 94
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming 883 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2016
Minn. Const. art. 3, § 1; -18 (Minn. 1982); State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 293
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
Taylor v. State 670 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2003
-18 (Minn.1982) (citing State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , ).
State v. Schwartz 628 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2001
State v. Schwartz 628 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2001
3 (2000); State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 301-02 , (noting that a person released on parole remains in the legal custody of the state).
State v. Hanson 572 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1997
State v. Hanson 572 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1997
Ahem v. Young, 273 Minn. 240,243 , (“determination of what conduct constitutes a criminal offense and the punishment that ought to be imposed * * * is peculiarly a legislative and not a judicial function”); State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 293 , ).
Backdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 479 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Backdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 479 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 303-04
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 299
State v. Olson 325 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
State v. Olson 325 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286
Riley v. State 294 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1980
Riley v. State 294 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1980
The history and purposes of that act are set forth in State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286
State v. Jonason 292 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1980
State v. Jonason 292 N.W.2d 730 Minn. 1980
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240 , State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286
State v. Tyler 275 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1979
State v. Tyler 275 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1979
2 A detailed examination of the history, purpose, and provisions of the youth act is set forth in State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , Pirsig, Procedural Aspects of the Youth Conservation Act, 32 Minn.L.Rev.
State v. Osterloh 275 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1978
State v. Osterloh 275 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1978
Ahern v. Young, 273 Minn. 240, 243 , this court said: “Determination of what conduct constitutes a criminal offense and the punishment that ought to be imposed (including the terms and conditions of probation, confinement, and parole) is peculiarly a legislative and not a judicial function.” Accord, State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 293
Welfare of Loyd v. Youth Conservation Commission 177 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1970
Welfare of Loyd v. Youth Conservation Commission 177 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1970
This appeal challenges the validity of State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 , 2 as it relates, to this case, in light of recent holdings of the United States Supreme Court and of other state courts.
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank 172 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1969
Hunt v. Nevada State Bank 172 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1969
Co. 215 Minn. 442 , 10 N. W. (2d) 382 ; City of Duluth v. Cerveny, 218 Minn. 511 , 16 N. W. (2d) 779 ; State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State v. Weigold 160 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1968
State v. Weigold 160 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1968
240 Minn. 407 , 61 N. W. (2d) 757 ; State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 ; Mesaba Loan Co. v. Sher, 203 Minn. 589, 595 , ; Henneford v. Silas Mason Co. 300 U. S. 577, 583 , 57 S. Ct. 524, 527 , 81 L. ed. 814, 819.
State v. Harris 152 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1967
State v. Harris 152 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1967
See, State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 , and cases cited.
State Ex Rel. Ahern v. Young 141 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Ahern v. Young 141 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 1966
9 State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286, 304 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3, 14 .
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 165 Minn. 1963
See, State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 .
State v. Friswold 116 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1962
State v. Friswold 116 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1962
7 State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 ; 16A C. J. S., Constitutional Law, § 502.
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. Spaeth, 209 Minn. 504 , ; State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 ; Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, 234 Minn. 221 , 48 N. W. (2d) 175 ; State ex rel.
State v. Lorenz 50 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1951
State v. Lorenz 50 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1951
227 Minn. 212 , 35 N. W. (2d) 343 ; State v. Meyer, 228 Minn. 286 , 37 N. W. (2d) 3 ; State ex rel.