Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Potter v. Potter, 27 N.W.2d 784.

26 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See W. World Ins., d at 7 2; (explaining that “on appeal[,] error is never presumed,” that “[i]t must be made to appear affirmatively before there can be reversal[,]” and that “the burden of showing error rests 32 upon the one who relies upon it” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie Wingad Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: David Gordon Wingad v. Janet Marie Wingad Minn. Ct. App. 2024
d 784, 786 (Minn. 1947) (“[W]e do not reverse unless there is error causing harm to the appealing party.”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodrick Dean Pouncy, Jr Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Rodrick Dean Pouncy, Jr Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Emily Kay Stilwagon, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
Nelson v. Austin Transit, Inc. 135 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1965
See, Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489 , 13 N. W. (2d) 461 ; Fewell v. Tappan, 223 Minn. 483 , 27 N. W. (2d) 648 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
Silverness v. Silverness 134 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1965
Silverness v. Silverness 134 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 1965
See, Johnson v. Johnson, 250 Minn. 282 , 84 N. W. (2d) 249 ; Baskerville v. Baskerville, 246 Minn. 496 , 75 N. W. (2d) 762 ; Krusemark v. Krusemark, 232 Minn. 416 , 46 N. W. (2d) 647 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America 107 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1961
Winter v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America 107 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 1961
Co. 23 Minn. 314 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Mfg.
Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Hartwig v. Loyal Order of Moose, Brainerd Lodge No. 1246 91 N.W.2d 794 Minn. 1958
Co. 23 Minn. 314 , this court said that: “A defective pleading, clearly amendable in the discretion of the trial court, cannot be taken advantage of in this court by a party who had an opportunity to make his objection to it in the court below, but omitted so to do.” Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Segerstrom v. Holland Piano Mfg.
Johnson v. Johnson 84 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1957
Johnson v. Johnson 84 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 1957
1 Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
Albertson v. Albertson 67 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1954
Albertson v. Albertson 67 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1954
9 Wilson v. Wilson, 229 Minn. 126 , 38 N. W. (2d) 154 ; Arp v. Arp, 229 Minn. 6 , 38 N. W. (2d) 67 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; see, 35 Minn. L. Rev. 168 , 177 to 178.
Kate v. Kate 48 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1951
Kate v. Kate 48 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1951
Compare awards made in Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Baker v. Baker, 224 Minn. 117 , 28 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Hempel v. Hempel, 225 Minn. 287 , 30 N. W. (2d) 594 ; and Swanson v. Swanson, 233 Minn. 354 , 46 N. W. (2d) 878 .
Swanson v. Swanson 46 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1951
Swanson v. Swanson 46 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1951
3 Clark v. Clark, 114 Minn. 22 , ; Webber v. Webber, 157 Minn. 422 , ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Loth v. Loth, 227 Minn. 387 , 35 N. W. (2d) 542 , 6 A. L. R. (2d) 176.
Arp v. Arp 38 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1949
Arp v. Arp 38 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1949
Suffice it to say that in our opinion plaintiff’s testimony was sufficiently corroborated under the rule laid down in Graml v. Graml, supra, and followed in Gerard v. Gerard, 216 Minn. 543 , 13 N. W. (2d) 606 ; Visneski v. Visneski, 219 Minn. 217 , 17 N. W. (2d) 313 ; Louden v. Louden, 221 Minn. 338 , 22 N. W. (2d) 164 ; Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784 .
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
Loth v. Loth 35 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1949
As said in Potter v. Potter, 224 Minn. 29, 32 , 27 N. W. (2d) 784, 786 (quoting from Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , 13 N. W. [2d] 461, 464): “It is well to bear in mind that on appeal error is never presumed.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by