Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mattfeld v. Nester, 32 N.W.2d 291.

135 citing documents.

Chue Her, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nevertheless, the supreme court has held that “appellate courts, in order to sustain verdicts and judgments, will permit omissions to be supplied by documentary evidence of a conclusive nature.” -04 (Minn. 1948); see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Marriage of: Sandra Kay Vogt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 126
In re the Estate of: Mary Ann Nething Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Mary Ann Nething Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cf. Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 123, -04 (1948) (allowing appellate courts to affirm based on “documentary evidence of a conclusive nature” even if that documentary evidence is outside the record).
State v. Smith 835 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
State v. Smith 835 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
at 319, d at 847 (quoting Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 124 , ).
State v. Anderson 733 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 2007
State v. Anderson 733 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 2007
(quoting Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 123, ).
State v. LaRose 673 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. LaRose 673 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Plowman, d at 584 (citing Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , ).
In Re the Estate of Riggle 654 N.W.2d 710 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re the Estate of Riggle 654 N.W.2d 710 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Paul, (quoting Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 123 , -04 (1948)), review denied (Minn. Dec.
In Re Livingood 594 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
In Re Livingood 594 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
In re Real Property Taxes for 1980 As sessment; , 718 n. 3 (Minn.1983) (citing Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 122 , Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., -84 (Minn.1977)).
State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Keeton 573 N.W.2d 378 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
20, 1994) (quoting Mattfeld n Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , ).
Anderson v. Lake 536 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Anderson v. Lake 536 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 126
Chahla v. City of St. Paul 507 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Chahla v. City of St. Paul 507 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , the court upheld a trial court’s post-verdict reception of letters of special administration.
Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance 494 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1993
Carlson v. Mutual Service Insurance 494 N.W.2d 885 Minn. 1993
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 123 , -04 (1948).
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Roers v. Engebretson 479 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106
Behlke v. Conwed Corp. 474 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Behlke v. Conwed Corp. 474 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 126
Hunt v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 460 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990
Hunt v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 460 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1990
See Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 130
Hanson v. Larson 459 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hanson v. Larson 459 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
App. P. 110.01; cf. Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 122 , (production of record evidence is never allowed in an appellate court for the purpose of reversing a judgment).
Hunt v. Regents of University 446 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hunt v. Regents of University 446 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 126
Brandt v. State 428 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Brandt v. State 428 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106
Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson 426 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson 426 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cf., Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 123 , (certified copies of letters of special administration admissible after trial because of conclusive nature of proof).
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 399 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1987
Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. Jensen 399 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1987
Bastianson v. Forschen, 293 Minn. 31, 43 , Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 136
Thomas v. Fey 376 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thomas v. Fey 376 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Bonhiver v. Fugelso, Porter, Simich & Whiteman, Inc. 355 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 1984
Cf. Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106 , (no record of court authorizing special administrator to continue previously initiated personal injury suit as wrongful death under Minn.Stat.
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
State v. Langley 354 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1984
12 Furthermore, “[argumentative questions not only fail to elicit facts and to contribute to the ascertainment of truth * * * but also they invade the province of , the jury, which is to determine the facts.” Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 127 , -06 (1948).
In Re Obj. and Def. to Real Prop. Taxes 335 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1983
Village Apartments v. State 335 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1983
In Re Obj. and Def. to Real Prop. Taxes 335 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1983
See Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 122 , Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., -84 (Minn.1977).
Village Apartments v. State 335 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1983
See Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106, 122 , Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd., -84 (Minn.1977).
Murray v. Walter 269 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1978
Murray v. Walter 269 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1978
Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 248 Minn. 240 , Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106