Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America, 45 N.W.2d 637.

88 citing documents.

Carlson v. Powlish 428 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Carlson v. Powlish 428 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
ANALYSIS A motion for directed verdict should be granted only in those unequivocal cases where after viewing the evidence in the light most favoring the nonmoving party, “it would clearly be the duty of the trial court to set aside a contrary verdict as being manifestly against the entire evidence, or * * * contrary to the law applicable to the case.” Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co., 232 Minn. 403, 405 , (emphasis in original).
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Sievert v. LaMarca 367 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Para *587 Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co., 232 Minn. 403, 404
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
Peterson v. Little-Giant Glencoe Portable Elevator Division of Dynamics Corp. of America 366 N.W.2d 111 Minn. 1985
Nelson v. Henning 354 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nelson v. Henning 354 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co. of Am., 232 Minn. 403, 404-05
Elias v. City of St. Paul 350 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Elias v. City of St. Paul 350 N.W.2d 442 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co. of America, 232 Minn. 403, 404, 405 , the Minnesota Supreme Court said: It is elementary that a motion for a directed verdict, which by its very nature accepts the view of the entire, evidence most favorable to the adverse party and admits the credibility (except in extreme cases) of the evidence in his favor and all
Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
Viewing *670 the entire evidence in a light most favorable to the adverse parties, Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America, 232 Minn. 403, 404-05 , a directed verdict is sustainable only if it would clearly be the duty of the trial court to set aside a contrary verdict, as against the evidence or contrary to the law of the case.
Walton v. Jones 286 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1979
Walton v. Jones 286 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1979
Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America, 232 Minn. 403
Smith v. Knowles 281 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1979
Smith v. Knowles 281 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1979
Treating the dismissal as a directed verdict, this court must give effect to the established rule that a motion for a directed verdict, “ * * * accepts the view of the entire evidence most favorable to the adverse party and admits the credibility * * of the evidence in his favor and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom * Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of America, 232 Minn. 403, 405 , (emphasis original, footnotes omitted).
Rohling v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 243 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1976
Rohling v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 243 N.W.2d 742 Minn. 1976
Snortland v. Olsonawski 238 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1976
Snortland v. Olsonawski 238 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1976
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 404 , : “It is elementary that a motion for a directed verdict * * * should be granted only in those unequivocal cases where (1) in the light of the evidence as a whole, it would clearly be the duty of the trial court to set aside a contrary verdict as being manifestly against the entire ev
LaBeau v. Buchanan 236 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1975
LaBeau v. Buchanan 236 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1975
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 404 , *351
Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
Bisbee v. Ruppert 235 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1975
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , Lee v. Smith, 253 Minn. 401
Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co. 231 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1975
Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co. 231 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1975
Lundeen v. Renteria 224 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1974
Lundeen v. Renteria 224 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1974
Co. of America, 232 Minn. 403, 404
Kastner v. Wermerskirschen 205 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1973
Kastner v. Wermerskirschen 205 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1973
Nelson v. Nelson 166 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1969
Nelson v. Nelson 166 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1969
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; and 19 Dunnell, Dig.
Kennedy v. Caudell 151 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1967
Kennedy v. Caudell 151 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1967
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 .
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Bloomquist v. William H. Ziegler Co. Inc. 133 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1965
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Westling v. Holm, 239 Minn. 191 , 58 N. W. (2d) 252 ; Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Imp.
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Downey v. Frey 130 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1964
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kundiger v. Prudential Ins.
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
McCormick v. Malecha 122 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1963
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kath v. Kath, 238 Minn. 120 , 55 N. W. (2d) 691 , 37 Minn. L. Rev. 389 ; Giermann v. St.
Cunningham v. Federal Cartridge Corporation 122 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1963
Cunningham v. Federal Cartridge Corporation 122 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1963
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 405 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 .
Lenz v. Johnson 122 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1963
Lenz v. Johnson 122 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 1963
Co. of America, 232 Minn. 403, 405 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 .
Gustafson v. Schilt 116 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1962
Gustafson v. Schilt 116 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1962
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649 .
Grussing v. Binger 114 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1962
Grussing v. Binger 114 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1962
Co. 232 Minn. 403 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637 ; Kolatz v. Kelly, 244 Minn. 163 , 69 N. W. (2d) 649 .
Bury v. City of Minneapolis 102 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1960
Bury v. City of Minneapolis 102 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1960
Co. 232 Minn. 403, 405 , 45 N. W. (2d) 637, 638 .