Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Dissolution of School District No. 33, 60 N.W.2d 60.

37 citing documents.

Jeffrey S. Sheridan, et al., Minn. 2021
No. 33, because “headnotes .
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore System 488 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See In re Dissolution of School District No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 443-44 , (revisor’s actions do not show legislative intent).
Appeal of Meyer v. Village of Waite Park 152 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1967
Appeal of Meyer v. Village of Waite Park 152 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1967
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 , this court held, on the issue of the right of a signer to withdraw his name from a petition, that although a petition has been filed with the county auditor any signer thereon has the unqualified right to withdraw his name from the petition — by a proper demand upon the board of county commissione
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp. 131 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1964
In Re Petition of Minneapolis Area Development Corp. 131 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1964
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 450 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60, 67 , we said: “* * * When a board of county commissioners is acting in proceedings for the dissolution, attachment, or consolidation of school districts it is exercising a legislative function which is not governed by judicial standards and its determinations are subject to successful attack o
In RE APPEAL OF LEGO v. Rolfe 129 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1964
In RE APPEAL OF LEGO v. Rolfe 129 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1964
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 ; Sullivan v. Joint Ind.
COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2386 v. County of Wabasha 121 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1963
COMMON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2386 v. County of Wabasha 121 N.W.2d 767 Minn. 1963
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 450 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60, 67 , that in proceedings of this kind a county board is not acting as a court of law but is “exercising a legislative function which is not governed by judicial standards.” Minn. St.
Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585 121 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1963
Walters v. Common School Districts Nos. 2550, 2551, 2583, & 2585 121 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1963
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 .
Brossard v. Durst 120 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1963
Brossard v. Durst 120 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1963
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 , that when this statute was amended it was clearly intended to extend its application to all school district dissolution proceedings and that any other holding would ignore the plain meaning of the statutory phrase, “any other district.” Respondents contend that “petition” and “resolution” in the l
State Ex Rel. McGregor v. Rigg 109 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1961
State Ex Rel. McGregor v. Rigg 109 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 1961
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 .
In Re Dissolution and Distribution of School Dist. No. 5 257 Minn. 409 Minn. 1960
Brossard v. Durst 102 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1960
In Re Dissolution and Distribution of School Dist. No. 5 257 Minn. 409 Minn. 1960
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 446 , 60 N.W.
Brossard v. Durst 102 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1960
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 446 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 , 65: “* * * with respect to a functioning school district, the petition is a jurisdictional prerequisite only to effect a dissolution [italics omitted] and that the part of the petition which prays for the subsequent attachment of the territory to another school district is surplusage.” (Itali
State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Mettler 89 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Mettler 89 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1958
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 ; In re Order of Superintendent of Schools, Nobles County, 239 Minn. 233 , 58 N. W. (2d) 465 .
Sullivan v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 88 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
Sullivan v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 102 88 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 , where we held that it is too late to withdraw once the county board has acted on a petition for dissolution under § 122.28.
Melby v. Hellie 80 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1957
Melby v. Hellie 80 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1957
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 450 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60, 67 , we held that the signer of such petition may withdraw his signature before the board has acted on the petition but that— “* * * the right of a signer to withdraw his name from a petition ceases to exist the moment the board of county commissioners exercises any action in reliance upon the
State Ex Rel. Village of Orono v. Village of Long Lake 77 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1956
State Ex Rel. Village of Orono v. Village of Long Lake 77 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1956
In In re Dissolution of School District No. 33, 239 Minn. 439, 448 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60, 66 , a case involving a petition for the dissolution of a functioning school district and for,the subsequent attachment of its territory to another existing school district, we said: *273 “* * * Although § 122.28 [the statute involved in that case] does not prescribe what must be contained in
Allen v. Holm 66 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1954
Allen v. Holm 66 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1954
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 .
In Re Order of Sammons, Co. Superintendent of Schools 242 Minn. 345 Minn. 1954
In Re Order of Sammons, Co. Superintendent of Schools 242 Minn. 345 Minn. 1954
No. 33, Mille Lacs County, 239 Minn. 439, 448 , 60 N.W.
Lindahl v. Fitzsimmons 61 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1953
Lindahl v. Fitzsimmons 61 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1953
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 , and In re Dissolution of Independent School Dist.
In Re Dissolution of Independent School District No. 27 60 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1953
In Re Dissolution of Independent School District No. 27 60 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1953
No. 33, 239 Minn. 439 , 60 N. W. (2d) 60 , after an exhaustive and thorough examination of this statutory provision, we held that, upon a proper petition, a county hoard may dissolve any school district, whether it is a functioning school district or a nominal or so-called withered school district, and also that, once the school district i