Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Aberle v. Faribault Fire Department Relief Ass'n, 41 N.W.2d 813.

24 citing documents.

Randy Dale Sixta, Appellant, vs. Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things C/D-5 as alternatives.”).
Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. 2024
Explained Brian Matthew Nash v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. 2024
Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, (stating that “[t]he word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives”).
Nationwide Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
Aberle v. Faribault 12 Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See generally Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dept. Relief Ass’n, (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 877 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2016
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 877 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 2016
Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass'n, 230 Minn. 353, 359 , State v. Croatt, 227 Minn. 185, 191
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond Struzyk 869 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond Struzyk 869 N.W.2d 280 Minn. 2015
We have “long held that in the absence of some ambiguity surrounding the [L]egislature’s use of the word ‘or,’ we will read it in the disjunctive and require that only one of the possible factual situations be present in order for the statute to be satisfied.” see also Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dept. Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360 , (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).
In re Petition for Review of Panel Decision against Panel Case No. 35104. 851 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 2014
In re Petition for Review of Panel Decision against Panel Case No. 35104. 851 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 2014
See Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360, (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
see also Aberle v. Fairbault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360
State v. Broten 836 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Broten 836 N.W.2d 573 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
see also Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360 , (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as *577 alternatives.”).
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
Cloud Hosp., (“Absent context revealing that the word ‘or’ should be read as a conjunctive, we have generally read ‘or’ to be disjunctive.”); Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360 , (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”); see also Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 872 (11th ed.2004) (defining “or” as “a function word to indicate an alternative”).
State v. Loge 608 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2000
State v. Loge 608 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2000
See, Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dept. Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360 , (“The word ‘or’ is a disjunctive and ordinarily refers to different things as alternatives.”).
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital 598 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1999
Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital 598 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1999
See, -15 (Minn.1991); Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dept. Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360
Petition of D & a Truck Line, Inc. 524 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Petition of D & a Truck Line, Inc. 524 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Rossow, 310 Minn. 399, 401 , Aberle v. Faribault Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, 230 Minn. 353, 360 , Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. North *8 ern Pac.