Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. End, 45 N.W.2d 378.

47 citing documents.

A19-1701 A19-1702 A19-1703 Minn. 2020
We have recognized that “where words particularly designating specific acts or things are followed by and associated with words of general import,” the rule of ejusdem generis states that “the latter are generally to be regarded as comprehending only matters of the same kind or class as those particularly stated.” State v. End , (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Goplen v. Olmsted County Support & Recovery Unit 610 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Goplen v. Olmsted County Support & Recovery Unit 610 N.W.2d 686 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Under the doctrine of ejusdem generis, the general wording of a statute must be interpreted to include only matters of the same kind or class as those specifically enumerated, State v. End, 232 Minn. 266, 272 , in this case, the collection of arrears.
State v. Duncan 605 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Duncan 605 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266, 269
Wayne v. MasterShield, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wayne v. MasterShield, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 917 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , C.f. Minn.Stat.
State v. Ritter 486 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Ritter 486 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
This principle is “especially applicable to statutes defining crimes.” State v. End, 232 Minn. 266, 272
In Re Silvestri's Teaching Contract With Independent School District No. 695 480 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re Silvestri's Teaching Contract With Independent School District No. 695 480 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The word “such” is defined as “meaning of the sort or degree previously indicated or contextually implied; having the quality already or just specified.” State v. End, 232 Minn. 266, 270 , (citing Webster’s New Int'l Dictionary 2518 (2d ed. 1947)).
State v. Moore 431 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
State v. Soto 378 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1985
See also State v. Haas, 280 Minn. 197 , State v. End, 232 Minn. 266
State v. Anderson 370 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Anderson 370 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266, 272
State v. Forsman 260 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1977
State v. Forsman 260 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 1977
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266
City of St. Paul v. Whidby 203 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
City of St. Paul v. Whidby 203 N.W.2d 823 Minn. 1972
The court cited State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , as one of the many contrary state decisions which are in error.
Erschens Ex Rel. Erschens v. County of Lincoln 177 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1970
Erschens Ex Rel. Erschens v. County of Lincoln 177 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1970
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 .
State v. Haas 159 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1968
State v. Haas 159 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1968
609.01, 645.08(1, 3), 645.16; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 .
State v. Thomas 156 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1968
State v. Thomas 156 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1968
(3 ed.) §§ 6748, 6801, and cases cited; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 ; State v. Ketterer, 248 Minn. 173 , 79 N. W. (2d) 136 ; State v. Robitshek, 60 Minn. 123 , , 33 L. R. A. 33.
City of Bloomington v. Kossow 131 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1964
City of Bloomington v. Kossow 131 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1964
2 See State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 , holding that violation of a municipal ordinance is not an offense within the meaning of Minn. St.
City of St. Paul v. Morris 104 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1960
State v. Finn 100 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1960
State v. Finn 100 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1960
15 State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 ; M. S. A. 645.16; see Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v. United States, 300 U. S. 98, 101 , 57 S. Ct. 356, 358 , 81 L. ed. 532, 535, where the court noted that “the object of all construction, whether of penal or other statutes, is to ascertain the legislative intent; and in penal statutes, as in those o
State v. Hoben 98 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1959
State v. Hoben 98 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1959
See, State v. H. J. Minar Co. 249 Minn. 116 , 81 N. W. (2d) 268 ; State v. Maxwell, 249 Minn. 277 , 81 N. W. (2d) 855 ; State v. Gardin, 251 Minn. 157 , 86 N. W. (2d) 711 ; State v. Ketterer, 248 Minn. 173 , 79 N. W. (2d) 136 ; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 .
Springborg v. WILSON & CO. INC. 95 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1959
Springborg v. WILSON & CO. INC. 95 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 1959
Paul, 240 Minn. 434 , 61 N. W. (2d) 533 ; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 .
State v. McCabe 87 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1957
State v. McCabe 87 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1957
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 ; State v. Jamieson, 211 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Nelson, 157 Minn. 506 , .
State v. Gardin 86 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1957
State v. Gardin 86 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1957
State v. Ketterer, 248 Minn. 173 , 79 N. W. (2d) 136 ; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 .
State v. Maxwell 81 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1957
State v. Maxwell 81 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1957
State v. Ketterer, 248 Minn. 178 , 79 N. W. (2d) 136 ; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 .
State v. Wilson 69 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1955
State v. Wilson 69 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1955
State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 ; State v. Jamieson, 211 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Nelson, 157 Minn. 506 , .
State v. Finley 64 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1954
State v. Finley 64 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1954
State v. Robitshek, 60 Minn. 123 , , 33 L. R. A. 33; State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N. W. (2d) 378 ; City of St.
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
State v. Clarke Plumbing & Heating, Inc. 56 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1952
[5] For comments on the nature of a prosecution for the violation of a city ordinance, see State v. End, 232 Minn. 266 , 45 N.W.