Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 59 N.W.2d 841.

57 citing documents.

In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. State, (footnote omitted); (quoting this aspect of Graphic Arts in a marital-dissolution appeal).
A23-0239 State of Minnesota v. Ronald Eugene Brusacoram Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0239 State of Minnesota v. Ronald Eugene Brusacoram Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Under the Rainbow Early Education Center, Minn. 2022
First, in State v. Northwestern Vocational Institute, Inc. , and Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, we considered vocational training programs.
Kristen Glaros Hanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Gill v. Gill 919 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2018
Gill v. Gill 919 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 2018
v. State , 240 Minn. 143 , , 844 (1953) ("[T]he labeling of a conclusion of law as a 'finding of fact' is not determinative of its true nature, and it need not be considered a finding by the appellate court.").
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Dale Allen Lindsey. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Found., Inc. v. State , 240 Minn. 143, 145, (discussing Minn. Stat. § 546.27 (2016)).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ely Ovis Emmanuel Sabahot Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Found., Inc. v. State , 240 Minn. 143, 146, (“[T]he labeling of a conclusion of law as a ‘finding of fact’ is not determinative of its true nature .
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Edwin Harju Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Found., Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46, (“[A] fact found by the court, although expressed as a conclusion of law, will be treated upon appeal as a finding of fact.”).
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Custody of M. M. L. Nathan James Sands v. Sue Mae Lovick, Dakota County Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 146, (“[T]he labeling of a conclusion of law as a ‘finding of fact’ is not determinative of its true nature, and it need not be considered a finding by the appellate court.”); -51 (Minn. App. 1985) (concluding that shifting the costs of visitation fro
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Found., Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46, d 841, 844 (1953)), review denied (Minn. May 16, 2006).
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 146
State of Minnesota v. Richard William Reynolds, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Richard William Reynolds, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Found., Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145−46, (“[A] fact found by the court, although expressed as a conclusion of law, will be treated upon appeal as a finding of fact.”); see also Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351 n.1, n.1 (1971) (quoting Graphic Arts, 240 Minn. at 145−46, d at 844).
S. M. K. v. D. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
S. M. K. v. D. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Found., Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46, d 841, 844 (1953).
Big Lake Lumber, Inc. v. Security Property Investments, Inc. 836 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2013
Big Lake Lumber, Inc. v. Security Property Investments, Inc. 836 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2013
v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46
In Re Peer Review Action 749 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Peer Review Action 749 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46 , (holding that a fact found by the court, even if expressed as a conclusion of law, is treated as a finding of fact).
State v. Holliday 745 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2008
State v. Holliday 745 N.W.2d 556 Minn. 2008
v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46
Dailey v. Chermak 709 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dailey v. Chermak 709 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Found., Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46 , 2 David F. Herr & Roger S. Haydock, Minnesota Practice § 52.5 (2004).
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Maloney v. Ketter 408 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
When appealing denial of a new trial motion, “any finding of fact may be challenged as not sustained by the evidence.” Graphic Arts Educational Foundation v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 144 , (footnote omitted).
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Otte v. Otte 368 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See generally Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145-46
Bounds v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bounds v. Commissioner of Public Safety 353 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143
Dillavou v. Peters 349 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Dillavou v. Peters 349 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145
Morton v. Board of Com'rs of Ramsey County 223 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1974
Morton v. Board of Com'rs of Ramsey County 223 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1974
Plaintiffs have not urged reversal of the judgment upon this ground and, this being the case, the “finding,” which we consider to be a conclusion of law (Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143 , ) could be disregarded at this time on the ground that the judgment as entered, as distinguished from the legal reasoning adopted by the trial court in support of its order, is controlling.
Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of Taxation 207 N.W.2d 37 Minn. 1973
Bissell v. Bissell 191 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1971
Bissell v. Bissell 191 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1971
“* * * [A] fact found by the *352 court, although expressed as a conclusion of law, will be treated upon appeal as a finding of fact.” Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145
Camping and Education Foundation v. State 164 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1969
Camping and Education Foundation v. State 164 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1969
See, Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143 , 59 N. W. (2d) 841 ; State v. Northwestern Preparatory School, 249 Minn. 552 , 83 N. W. (2d) 242 ; State v. Northwestern Vocational Institute, Inc. 232 Minn. 377 , 45 N. W. (2d) 653 .
Midway Mobile Home Mart, Inc. v. City of Fridley 135 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1965
Midway Mobile Home Mart, Inc. v. City of Fridley 135 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1965
See, also, Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143 , 59 N. W. (2d) 841 ; Naffke v. Naffke, 240 Minn. 468 , 62 N. W. (2d) 63 .
Concordia College Corporation v. State 120 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1963
Concordia College Corporation v. State 120 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1963
State v. Carleton College, 154 Minn. 280 , ; State v. Bishop Seabury Mission, 90 Minn. 92 , ; Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143 , 59 N. W. (2d) 841 .
NATIONAL FIRE INS. CO., INC. v. Commodore Hotel, Inc. 107 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1961
NATIONAL FIRE INS. CO., INC. v. Commodore Hotel, Inc. 107 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1961
See, Graphic Arts Educational Foundation, Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145 , 59 N. W. (2d) 841, 844 , construing Minn. St.
First Trust Co. of St. Paul v. McLean 93 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1958