DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Simon v. Carroll, 62 N.W.2d 822.

62 citing documents.

  • Hailey Elisabeth Steele Daberkow, a minor, by and through her parents and natural guardians John Daberkow and Bernadette … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    “Generally, the trial court may establish the procedure for presentation of a case in an unusual situation, absent an abuse of discretion.” (citing Simon v. Carroll , ) .
  • Osborne v. Chapman 574 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1998
  • Osborne v. Chapman 574 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1998
    Proximate cause is a question of fact “except when the facts are undisputed and are reasonably susceptible of but one inference.” Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 217
  • Goswitz v. Fiedler 435 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
  • Goswitz v. Fiedler 435 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
    See Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , Tripplet v. Hernandez, 238 Minn. 208
  • In re the Occupational License of Haymes 427 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • In re the Occupational License of Haymes 427 N.W.2d 248 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 218
  • State v. Sobocinski 395 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Sobocinski 395 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 220-21 , -29 (1954) (opinion evidence permitted as part of testimony on community reputation for truthfulness).
  • In re the Welfare of D.S.F. 393 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • In re the Welfare of D.S.F. 393 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 216
  • Emery Air Freight Corp. v. Local 544, International Brotherhood of Teamsters 379 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Emery Air Freight Corp. v. Local 544, International Brotherhood of Teamsters 379 N.W.2d 539 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211
  • Holasek v. First National Bank of Rochester 278 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1979
  • Holasek v. First National Bank of Rochester 278 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 1979
    See, Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Anderson, 272 Minn. 497, 501 , Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 218
  • Tomforde v. Newman 244 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1976
  • Tomforde v. Newman 244 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1976
    Holten v. Parker, 302 Minn. 167 , d *257 139 (1974); Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211
  • Ramirez v. Miska 228 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1975
  • Ramirez v. Miska 228 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1975
    Meurer v. Junkermeier, 291 Minn. 318 , Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211
  • Vanderweyst v. Langford 228 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1975
  • Vanderweyst v. Langford 228 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1975
    Meurer v. Junkermeier, 291 Minn. 318 , Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 241
  • Holten v. Parker 224 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1974
  • Holten v. Parker 224 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1974
    In Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 215 , this court elaborated on the prima facie case that arises by statute: “* * * It follows that, pursuant to § 169.18, subd.
  • Meurer v. Junkermeier 191 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1971
  • Meurer v. Junkermeier 191 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1971
    Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
  • Seivert v. Bass 181 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 1970
    In Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 , the plaintiff, Simon, testified that, after defendant Carroll’s sudden and high-speed appearance over a hilltop, he tried to turn to the right from his middle-of-the-road position of danger but that *464 he had no time to do so.
  • Shafer Ex Rel. Shafer v. Gaylord 176 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1970
  • Shafer Ex Rel. Shafer v. Gaylord 176 N.W.2d 745 Minn. 1970
    Lee v. Smith, 253 Minn. 401 , 92 N. W. (2d) 117 ; Erickson v. Strickler, 252 Minn. 351 , 90 N. W. (2d) 232 ; Majerus v. Guelsow, 262 Minn. 1 , 113 N. W. (2d) 450 ; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; and 19 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
  • Jorgensen v. Hawton 161 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1968
    Our decision that defendant Hawton’s negligence did not as a matter of law constitute a contributory or sole proximate cause of the collision is controlled by the well-settled principle that “[c]ausation, like negligence itself, is a fact issue for the jury except when the facts are undisputed and are reasonably susceptible of but one inference.” Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211, 217 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822, 827 .
  • Risacher v. Lien 155 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1967
  • Risacher v. Lien 155 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1967
    The evidence disclosed no possible intervening cause— either in point of time or series of events.” 4 Defendant cites Pluwak v. Lindberg, 268 Minn. 524 , 130 N. W. (2d) 134 ; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; and Dahling v. Dammann, 251 Minn. 171 , 87 N. W. (2d) 25 .
  • Grossman v. Wolkowitz 132 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1965
  • Grossman v. Wolkowitz 132 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1965
    Co. 246 Minn. 157 , 74 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; Shinofield v. Curtis, 245 Iowa 1352 , 66 N. W. (2d) 465 , 50 A. L. R. (2d) 964; and Williams v. Williams, 210 Wis.
  • Gebhard v. Niedzwiecki 122 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1963
  • Gebhard v. Niedzwiecki 122 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1963
    17 See, Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 .
  • American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Wusich 375 P.2d 364 Ariz. 1962
  • Krafft v. Hirt 110 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1961
  • Krafft v. Hirt 110 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1961
    3 Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; Tschida v. Dorle, 235 Minn. 461 , 51 N. W. (2d) 561 .
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
  • Lott v. Davidson 109 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1961
    “As another alternative, and there are three alternatives in all here, you may find that Gary Raymond exercised the highest degree of care for the safety of his passenger, and if you so find, then, necessarily you must also find that he exercised reasonable care.” 3 Dahling v. Dammann, supra; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; Chicago, St.
  • Coble v. Lacey 101 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1960
  • Coble v. Lacey 101 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1960
    8 Ramswick v. Messerer, 200 Minn. 299 , ; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 .
  • Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
  • Bush v. Havir 91 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1958
    Co. 246 Minn. 157 , 74 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Ryan v. Griffin, 241 Minn 91, 62 N. W. (2d) 504 ; Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 ; Donovan v. Ogston, 239 Minn. 553 , 59 N. W. (2d) 672 ; Guile v. Greenberg, 192 Minn. 548 , ; 13 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Dahling v. Dammann 87 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1957
  • Dahling v. Dammann 87 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 1957
    In Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 , we said that, if in the light of the entire evidence reasonable men can differ as to whether there is a causal connection between plaintiff’s negligent act and the happening of the collision, the question of proximate cause is for the jury.
  • Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
  • Thelen v. Spilman 86 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1957
    In Simon v. Carroll, 241 Minn. 211 , 62 N. W. (2d) 822 (cited by Reiten and Dakota), we did not hold that a motorist’s act of relying on custom may never be considered in determining if his violation of a prima facie statute was justified and therefore not negligent in fact.