Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Alvin v. Johnson, 63 N.W.2d 22.

24 citing documents.

State v. foothills/hanke Ariz. 2025
Robert Jensen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“An easement appurtenant to another lot, when created by conveyance, attaches to the possession of that other lot and follows it into whosesoever hands it may come .” (quotation omitted)).
Eric N. Nerland v. Kristy Lee Marie Barsch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Eric N. Nerland v. Kristy Lee Marie Barsch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An easement appurtenant to another lot, when created by conveyance, attaches to the possession of that other lot and ‘follows it into whosesoever hands it may come.’” Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257, 261, (quoting Restatement (First) of Property § 487 cmt.
County of Aitkin, relators v. Blandin Paper Company 883 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2016
County of Aitkin, relators v. Blandin Paper Company 883 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2016
See Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257, 262, (stating that “[a]ppurtenant easements are factors definitely affecting values”).
444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of Ramsey 830 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 2013
444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of Ramsey 830 N.W.2d 25 Minn. 2013
of Ramsey, -63 (Minn.2012); see also Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257, 262 , (“[I]n assessing the plaintiffs’ property, it was the assessor’s duty to take into consideration the additional value the property had by reason of the easement appurtenant.”).
Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 820 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2012
Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 820 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2012
County of Blue Earth v. Wingen 684 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
County of Blue Earth v. Wingen 684 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257, 264 , (stating that easement does not carry with it title to or right of possession of land).
Recreation Centers of Sun City, Inc. v. Maricopa County 782 P.2d 1174 Ariz. 1989
Quist v. Fuller 220 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1974
Quist v. Fuller 220 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1974
In view of § 541.01, our ruling in Neill v. Hake, 254 Minn. 110, 121 , that the public’s right may not be divested without public consent or operation of law, and our holding in Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257 , that a tax title conveyance does not terminate an unrecorded easement for a roadway across the property conveyed, the lower court properly considered and dismissed the applicability of the theory of abandonment.
Arizona R. C. I. A. Lands, Inc. v. Ainsworth 515 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Farnes v. Freeman Lane 161 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
Farnes v. Freeman Lane 161 N.W.2d 297 Minn. 1968
2 Romans v. Nadler, 217 Minn. 174 , 14 N. W. (2d) 482 ; Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257 , 63 N. W. (2d) 22 ; Polebitski v. John Week Lbr.
Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
Neill v. Hake 93 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1958
Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257 , 63 N. W. (2d) 22 ; Winston v. Johnson, 42 Minn. 398 , ; 17A Am.
State v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 75 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
State v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 75 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
See Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257 , 63 N. W. (2d) 22 , which has some bearing on the question here involved.
Alvin v. Johnson 71 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1955
Alvin v. Johnson 71 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1955
Alvin v. Johnson, 241 Minn. 257 , 63 N. W. (2d) 22 .