Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of Roseville, 70 N.W.2d 404.

35 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Contested Case Hearing Request by W. Lorentz & Sons Construction. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
of Roseville, -09 (Minn. 1955); Jasaka Co. v. City of St.
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347 , (“Even where the reasonableness of a zoning ordinance is debatable, * * * it is not the function of the courts to interfere with the legislative discretion on such issues.”).
Farmington Township v. High Plains Cooperative 460 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Farmington Township v. High Plains Cooperative 460 N.W.2d 56 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 441 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1989
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 441 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1989
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 350
Jasaka Co. v. City of St. Paul 309 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1981
Jasaka Co. v. City of St. Paul 309 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1981
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , that held “where a permit has been issued ..
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville 295 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1980
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville 295 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1980
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , The Alexander Co. v. City of Owatonna, 222 Minn. 312
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347 , : “Insofar as zoning ordinances are concerned, it has frequently been held that what best furthers public welfare is a matter primarily for determination of the legislative body concerned * * * “Even where the reasonableness of a zoning ordinance is debatable, or where there áre confl
Almquist v. Town of Marshan 245 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1976
Beck v. City of St. Paul 231 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1975
Beck v. City of St. Paul 231 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1975
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347 , : “ ‘Insofar as zoning ordinances are concerned, it has frequently been held that what best furthers, public welfare is a matter primarily for determination of the legislative body concerned * * * “ ‘Even where the reasonableness of a zoning ordinance is debatable, or where there are
Sun Oil Company v. Village of New Hope 220 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1974
Sun Oil Company v. Village of New Hope 220 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1974
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347 , : “Insofar as zoning ordinances are concerned, it has frequently been held that what best furthers public welfare is a matter primarily for determination of the legislative body concerned * * *.
County of Freeborn v. Claussen 203 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1972
County of Freeborn v. Claussen 203 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 1972
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 178 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1970
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis 178 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1970
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404 ; Kiges v. City of St.
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka 162 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1968
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404 , 407: “Even where the reasonableness of a zoning ordinance is debatable, or where there are conflicting opinions as to the desirability of the restrictions *495 it imposes * * *, it is not the function of the courts to interfere with the legislative discretion on such issues.” 1 The trial cou
Perron v. Village of New Brighton 145 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1966
Perron v. Village of New Brighton 145 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1966
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404 .
Filister v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1964
Filister v. City of Minneapolis 133 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1964
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 348 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404, 408 .
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 128 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1964
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 128 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1964
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404 .
Pearce v. Village of Edina 118 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 1962
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis 115 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1962
Olsen v. City of Minneapolis 115 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1962
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404 , on the issue of financial loss arising from zoning ordinance where owner had acquired property after zoning ordinance had gone into effect, it was held that he was presumed to have acquired it with full knowledge of such ordinance.
Connor v. Township of Chanhassen 81 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1957
Connor v. Township of Chanhassen 81 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1957
Howard v. Village of Roseville, 244 Minn. 343, 347 , 70 N. W. (2d) 404, 407 .