Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kubus, 68 N.W.2d 217.

34 citing documents.

Bryant Duane Griffin, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
1 “The writ of coram nobis is an old common-law writ, the purpose of which was to correct a judgment for errors in fact in the same court in which it was rendered.”
Hunter Lee Briscoe, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379, 381
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2 (2012))); see also State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379, 381, (explaining write of coram nobis).
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
State Ex Rel. Schwirtz v. Tahash 141 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1966
1 For other cases on the limited scope of coram nobis, see State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1963
State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282; State ex rel.
State v. Cage 117 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1962
State v. Tellock 118 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1962
State v. Cage 117 N.W.2d 919 Minn. 1962
2 See, State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 ; State ex rel.
State v. Tellock 118 N.W.2d 347 Minn. 1962
8 State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379, 381, note 3 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217, 218, note 1 ; Jaques v. Cesar (1668) 2 Saunders 100, note 1.
State v. Becker 115 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1962
State v. Becker 115 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1962
W. (2d) 166, 167 , as follows: “* * * Historically the writ’s function was to correct a judgment in the same court in which it was rendered for errors of fact which did did not appear in the record; which were unknown at the time of the trial without fault to the court and to the parties seeking relief; and which, if known, would have prevented the rendition of the verdict.” See, State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282
State v. Pederson 115 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1962
State v. Pederson 115 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1962
This court in State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379, 381 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217, 218 , said: “ * * In modern practice, the writ of error coram nobis may be defined as a common-law writ issuing out of a court of record to review and correct a judgment of its own relating to some error in fact as opposed to error in law, not appearing on the face of the record, unknown at t
State v. Soward 114 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1962
State v. Soward 114 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1962
1 The current application of the so-called writ of coram nobis is discussed in State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282.
State v. Castle 109 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1961
State v. Castle 109 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1961
1 The function of a writ of coram nobis has been adequately detailed in State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Gaulke v. County of Winona 106 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1960
State Ex Rel. Gaulke v. County of Winona 106 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1960
Hammond v. County of Hennepin, 256 Minn. 539 , 99 N. W. (2d) 452 ; State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282.
State Ex Rel. Elkins v. County of Ramsey 99 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Elkins v. County of Ramsey 99 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1959
See, State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282.
State Ex Rel. Hammond v. County of Hennepin 99 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1959
State Ex Rel. Hammond v. County of Hennepin 99 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 1959
3 See, State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282; State ex rel.
State v. Larkin 98 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1959
State v. Larkin 98 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 1959
572 , 141 A. (2d) 523; and see, State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282; Nolly v. State (Ala.
State Ex Rel. Soward v. County of Hennepin 90 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Soward v. County of Hennepin 90 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1958
State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282.
State Ex Rel. Williams v. County of Hennepin 89 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Williams v. County of Hennepin 89 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1958
4 For the function of a writ of coram nobis in a criminal matter, see State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282.
State Ex Rel. Barness v. County of Hennepin 89 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Barness v. County of Hennepin 89 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1958
*176 State v. Kubus, 243 Minn. 379 , 68 N. W. (2d) 217 , certiorari denied, 349 U. S. 959 , 75 S. Ct. 889 , 99 L. ed. 1282, left open the question whether the writ of coram nobis, as such, is still available to correct errors of fact in a criminal proceeding.