Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cameron v. Evans, 62 N.W.2d 793.

143 citing documents.

Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Jury instructions need only convey to the jury a “clear and correct understanding of the law.” Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 209
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 657 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Peterson v. BASF Corp. 657 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
The jury instruction charge need only “convey to the jury a clear and correct understanding of the law.” Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 209
Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , ).
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(quoting Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , ).
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stearns v. Plucinski 482 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(emphasis added) (quoting Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , ).
Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Paulson v. Lapa, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , -99 (1954).
Omnetics, Inc. v. Radiant Technology Corp. 440 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Omnetics, Inc. v. Radiant Technology Corp. 440 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, 64 , (quoting Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 202 , ).
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann 417 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann 417 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
Mervin v. Magney Construction Co. 416 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1987
E.g., Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 209
Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 233 Minn. 410, 421
Wagner v. Thomas J. Obert Enterprises 384 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Kohoutek v. Hafner 383 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1986
Kohoutek v. Hafner 383 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1986
In Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , we stated: [T]he charge of the trial court must be viewed in its entirety and from a practical and eommonsense point of view.
Fehling v. Levitan 382 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Fehling v. Levitan 382 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(quoting Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , ).
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc. 380 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See, e.g., Costello v. Johnson, 265 Minn. 204, 211 , Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 204
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 379 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ouellette Ex Rel. Ouellette v. Subak 379 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208-09 , (footnotes omitted).
Borka v. Emergency Physicians Professional Ass'n 379 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Borka v. Emergency Physicians Professional Ass'n 379 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
d at 875 , n. 16 (citing Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59, ).
Waseca Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Olson 379 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Waseca Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Olson 379 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208-09 , -99 (1954) (footnotes omitted).
Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A. 375 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kalsbeck v. Westview Clinic, P.A. 375 N.W.2d 861 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208
American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co. 353 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
American MacHine & Tool Co. v. Strite-Anderson Manufacturing Co. 353 N.W.2d 592 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208 , -99 (1954) (footnotes omitted)
Hughes v. Quarve & Anderson Co. 338 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1983
Hughes v. Quarve & Anderson Co. 338 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1983
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208-09
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern Hospital 283 N.W.2d 362 Minn. 1979
See, Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200
Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. Nelson 281 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1979
Kinning Ex Rel. Kinning v. Nelson 281 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1979
Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. 274 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1979
If the charge fairly lays down the law of the case, it is sufficient.” Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208
Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
Woodrow v. Tobler 269 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1978
Co., 257 Minn. 330 , Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200, 208
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
In Smith v. The Kahler Corp. Inc., 297 Minn. 272, 282 , citing Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , and Manion v. Tweedy, 257 Minn. 59 , we stated: “ ‘ * * * [T]he charge of the trial court must be viewed in its entirety and from a practical and commonsense point of view.
Kalpin v. Helgeson 254 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1977