Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Butler v. Swenson, 66 N.W.2d 1.
-
Minn. 2021
Butler v. Swenson , see also Schwanke, 47 N.W2d at 103 (holding that a habeas corpus proceeding is 21 Our research reveals that appellate courts from at least three states have expressly excluded ADA claims fro m habeas petitions.
- In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. I. and J. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Shannon Hollie v. Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner of Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Shannon Hollie v. Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner of Department of Human Services
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 29, (“Questions which should be .
- Rud v. Fabian 743 N.W.2d 295 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-
Rud v. Fabian
743 N.W.2d 295
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 28-29 , (stating that assertions of impropriety and incompetence by counsel did not constitute deprivation of fundamental right and, therefore, could not be addressed in habeas proceeding); Loyd, d at 690-91 (concluding that request for relief under contract theory was outside permissib
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.F. 638 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
In Re the Welfare of the Child of L.F.
638 N.W.2d 793
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 28 , ).
- In Re the Welfare of the Children of Coats 633 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2001
-
In Re the Welfare of the Children of Coats
633 N.W.2d 505
Minn. 2001
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 28
- Olsen v. State 177 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1970
-
Olsen v. State
177 N.W.2d 424
Minn. 1970
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 .
- State v. Fields 157 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1968
-
State v. Fields
157 N.W.2d 61
Minn. 1968
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 , two days was considered an adequate time in which to prepare.
- State v. Mance 438 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
- State v. Lund 151 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1967
-
State v. Lund
151 N.W.2d 769
Minn. 1967
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 28 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1, 4 , this court stated that the right to counsel is satisfied “if counsel is appointed in sufficient time to assure an adequate preparation of the defense.” In that case, counsel conferred with defendant on the day of appointment and had the following day to prepare for trial.
- State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
-
State v. Waldron
139 N.W.2d 785
Minn. 1966
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 ; State ex rel.
- State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash 122 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1963
-
State Ex Rel. Becker v. Tahash
122 N.W.2d 100
Minn. 1963
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 ; State ex rel.
- State ex rel. Farrington v. Tahash 115 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
-
State ex rel. Farrington v. Tahash
115 N.W.2d 921
Minn. 1962
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 29 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1, 4 , a new trial may be granted in exceptional cases for misconduct, fraud, or incompetence of defendant’s counsel, but “it is not a ground for habeas corpus that the counsel appointed to represent a defendant made a mistake or was negligent or gave bad advice to his client.” Defendant has failed
- State Ex Rel. Fife v. Tahash 111 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1961
-
State Ex Rel. Fife v. Tahash
111 N.W.2d 619
Minn. 1961
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 .
- State Ex Rel. White v. Tahash 111 N.W.2d 523 Minn. 1961
-
State Ex Rel. White v. Tahash
111 N.W.2d 523
Minn. 1961
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 .
- State v. Martineau 101 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1960
-
State v. Martineau
101 N.W.2d 410
Minn. 1960
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24, 28 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1, 4 , wherein it was said: “It is the weH-settled law of this state that a new trial may be *342 granted in exceptional cases where the accused was deprived of a fair trial because of the misconduct, fraud, or incompetence of his attorney.
- State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg 89 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1958
-
State Ex Rel. Adams v. Rigg
89 N.W.2d 898
Minn. 1958
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 ; State v. Lindstrom, 180 Minn. 435 , ; State v. Gleeman, 170 Minn. 197 , 212 N: W. 203.
- State v. Jordan 320 P.2d 446 Ariz. 1958
- State Ex Rel. Koalska v. Swenson 66 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1954
-
State Ex Rel. Koalska v. Swenson
66 N.W.2d 337
Minn. 1954
Butler v. Swenson, 243 Minn. 24 , 66 N. W. (2d) 1 .