DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 80 N.W.2d 30.

60 citing documents.

  • Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Cafferty v. Monson 360 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Co., 251 Minn. 345, 348 , ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 248 Minn. 240 , .
  • Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
  • Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co. 344 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1984
    4 The trial court correctly observed that an essential prerequisite to the application of res ipsa loquitur is that the person to be charged have “exclusive control” of the instrumentality causing the harm, Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 248 Minn. 240 , Johnson v. *863 Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Willmar, Inc., 235 Minn. 471
  • Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
  • Nemanic v. Gopher Heating & Sheet Metal, Inc. 337 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1983
    Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 248 Minn. 240, 247-48 , -38 (1957).
  • Murray v. Walter 269 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1978
  • Murray v. Walter 269 N.W.2d 47 Minn. 1978
    Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 248 Minn. 240 , Mattfeld v. Nester, 226 Minn. 106
  • Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
  • Cornfeldt v. Tongen 262 N.W.2d 684 Minn. 1977
    Although the diagnosis was not a “self-serving statement,” Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 248 Minn. 240, 247 , and thus would otherwise be admissible as a hospital record, Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Co., 298 Minn. 224, 232 , a difficulty arises because it is an unusual opinion of a nontestifying expert.
  • Wadena v. Bush 232 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1975
  • Wadena v. Bush 232 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 1975
    Co. 259 Minn. 168 , Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , Brown v. St.
  • Holten v. Parker 224 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1974
  • Holten v. Parker 224 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1974
    If “an unexplained accident may reasonably be attributed to one or more causes for which the defendant is not responsible, it is error to apply the rule as a basis for a permissive inference of negligence.” Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 244
  • Usher v. Allstate Insurance Company 218 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1974
  • Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis 214 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1974
  • Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of Minneapolis 214 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1974
    Co. 259 Minn. 168 , Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , Flemming v. Thorson, 231 Minn. 343 , Williams v. Alexander, 309 N. Y. 283 , 129 N. E. 2d 417 (1955); Commonwealth v. Harris, 351 Pa.
  • Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC. 211 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1973
  • Smith v. KAHLER CORPORATION, INC. 211 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1973
    Burdick v. Bongard, 256 Minn. 24 , Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240
  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
    248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
  • Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Lafortune 179 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1970
  • Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Lafortune 179 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1970
    1 Beckman v. Schroeder, 224 Minn. 370 , 28 N. W. (2d) 629 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 251 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 39 ; Carmody v. Aho, 251 Minn. 19, 23 , 86 N. W. (2d) 692, 695 ; and Murphy v. Hennen, 264 Minn. 457, 464 , 119 N. W. (2d) 489, 493 .
  • Bossons v. the Hertz Corporation 176 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
  • Bossons v. the Hertz Corporation 176 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1970
    Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Imp.
  • Standage v. Tarpey 446 P.2d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1968
  • City of Fairmont v. Sjostrom 157 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1968
  • City of Fairmont v. Sjostrom 157 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1968
    Co. 241 Minn. 15 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535, and Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
  • Boland v. Morrill 132 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1965
  • Boland v. Morrill 132 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1965
    Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Beebe v. Kleidon, 242 Minn. 521 , 65 N. W. (2d) 614 ; Willmar Gas Co. v. Duininck, 239 Minn. 173 , 58 N. W. (2d) 197 .
  • Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
  • Johnson v. Lorraine Park Apts. Inc. 128 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1964
    The issue raised is controlled by Carlson v. Fredsall, 228 Minn. 461 , 37 N. W. (2d) 744 , and Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 , which authorities hold that reference to pleadings by the adversary of the pleader may be proper for the purpose of impeachment or to show an admission.
  • Engel v. Starry 128 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1964
  • Engel v. Starry 128 N.W.2d 874 Minn. 1964
    Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co. 244 Minn. 401 , 70 N. W. (2d) 261 ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 125 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1964
  • Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 125 N.W.2d 725 Minn. 1964
    In Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 244 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 36 , we said with respect to the application of the rule: “* * * it is elementary that the res ipsa loquitur rule has application only where the apparent cause of the accident is such that the defendant would be solely responsible for any negligence connected with it; and if an unexplained acc
  • Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
  • Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
    Co. 241 Minn. 15, 26 , 62 N. W. (2d) 688, 696 , 44 A. L. R. (2d) 535; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 247 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 37 .
  • Brabeck v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 117 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
  • Brabeck v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 117 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1962
    3 Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 250 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 39 .
  • Hammersten v. Reiling 115 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1962
  • Hammersten v. Reiling 115 N.W.2d 259 Minn. 1962
    Bush v. Havir, 253 Minn. 318 , 91 N. W. (2d) 784 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 ; Patton v. Minneapolis St.
  • Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
  • Roeder v. North American Life Insurance 106 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1960
    See, Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
  • Manion v. Tweedy 100 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1959
  • Manion v. Tweedy 100 N.W.2d 124 Minn. 1959
    1 Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
  • Meagher v. Kavli 97 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1959
  • Meagher v. Kavli 97 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1959
    244 Minn. 81 , 69 N. W. (2d) 673 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30 .
  • Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
  • Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
    4 Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co. 252 Minn. 135 , 89 N. W. (2d) 179 ; Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 248 Minn. 240, 246 , 80 N. W. (2d) 30, 37 ; Hagen v. Snow, 244 Minn. 101 , 69 N. W. (2d) 100 .