Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Barnes, 81 N.W.2d 864.

35 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“Pending a duly executed appeal, the jurisdiction of the [district] court is [s]uspended .
In re the Matter of: Colleen Jea’ne Olson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302–03, (footnotes omitted); see Minn. R. Civ.
Jason Edward Banks, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Barnes , 249 Minn. 301, 302 –03
Timothy Ayman Bakdash, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03, (footnotes omitted); see Minn. R. Civ.
State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr. 884 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Armando DeLaCruz, Jr. 884 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
249 Minn. 301, 305, -67 (1957).
In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Thulin 660 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(quoting State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , ) (concluding that “the jurisdiction of a trial court is suspended only to those matters necessarily involved in the appeal”).
Kellar v. Von Holtum 583 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Kellar v. Von Holtum 583 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
ending a duly executed appeal, the jurisdiction of a trial court is suspended only to those matters necessarily involved in the appeal, not as to those matters which are independent of, or which are supplemental to, the appeal or collateral to the proceeding in which the appealed order or judgment was rendered.” (quoting State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , ).
State, City of Crystal v. Kivi 554 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State, City of Crystal v. Kivi 554 N.W.2d 97 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , (footnote omitted).
Matter of Welfare of DSS 506 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Welfare of DSS 506 N.W.2d 650 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302
State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
State v. Dwire 409 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1987
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , (footnotes omitted; emphasis in original).
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fette v. Peterson 406 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 303 , (“[T]he jurisdiction of a trial court is suspended only as to those matters necessarily involved in the appeal, not as to those matters which are independent of, or which are supplemental to, the appeal or collateral to the proceeding in which the appealed order or judgment was rendere
State v. Dwire 401 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Dwire 401 N.W.2d 124 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , (footnotes omitted, emphasis in original).
Welsh v. City of Orono 355 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1984
Welsh v. City of Orono 355 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 1984
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301 , see also Minn. R.Civ.App.P.
Muecke v. State 348 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Muecke v. State 348 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03
Matter of Welfare of C. Children 348 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of C. Children 348 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
As the Minnesota Supreme Court said in State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , : Pending a duly executed appeal, the jurisdiction of a trial court is suspended only as to those matters necessarily involved in the appeal, not as to those matters which are independent of, or which are supplemental to, the appeal or collateral to the proceeding in which the appeal
Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
Spaeth v. City of Plymouth 344 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 1984
State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 302-03 , see also State ex rel.
Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Obermeyer 144 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 1966
Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 132 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1965
Honeymead Products Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 132 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1965
2, under which this court “may review any other matter as the interests of justice may require.” See, State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301, 303 , 81 N. W. (2d) 864, 866 .
State v. Collins 132 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
State v. Collins 132 N.W.2d 802 Minn. 1964
Compare State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301 , 81 N. W. (2d) 864 , and Euziere v. United States (10 Cir.) 266 F. (2d) 88.
State Ex Rel. Williams v. County of Hennepin 89 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Williams v. County of Hennepin 89 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1958
5 See, State v. Barnes, 249 Minn. 301 , 81 N. W. (2d) 864 .