Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 84 N.W.2d 593.

137 citing documents.

Edina Education Ass'n v. Board of Education 562 N.W.2d 306 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Rowan, d at 698 (employer can waive right to insist upon proceeding under CBA); Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 183-84 , (affirming denial of summary judgment where moving party claimed employees had not exhausted their contractual remedies, but record disclosed fact question whether employer waived right to plead exhaustion of remedies).
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 536 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1995
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd. 536 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1995
As to the third requirement— that plaintiff was discharged despite her qualifications — the trial court, citing Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , found that plaintiff was not “discharged” because she was placed on furlough status.
Meineke v. Twin City Fire Insurance 892 P.2d 1365 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 487 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Employers Mutual Companies v. Nordstrom 487 N.W.2d 543 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
at 85-86 , d at 250 (citing Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , Independent Sch.
Wagner v. Schwegmann's South Town Liquor, Inc. 485 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Wagner v. Schwegmann's South Town Liquor, Inc. 485 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 463 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 463 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
at 85-86 , d at 250 (citing Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , (commencing a suit in a court rather than relying on arbitration is a waiver of the right to arbitrate) and Independent School Dist.
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Weber v. Sentry Insurance 442 N.W.2d 164 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 175 , (Minn.Ct.
Alberts v. United Stockyards Corp. 413 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Alberts v. United Stockyards Corp. 413 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Lyons v. Health & Human Services Department 413 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lyons v. Health & Human Services Department 413 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 175
Sanchez v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. 404 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sanchez v. Western Casualty & Surety Co. 404 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Swanson 403 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. Swanson 403 N.W.2d 678 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 181-82
Jonathan v. Kvaal 403 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Jonathan v. Kvaal 403 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Reserve Mining Co. v. Cooke 372 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Reserve Mining Co. v. Cooke 372 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This language was cited in Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , where the court indicated that a discharge is a termination with prejudice, while a layoff is a termination without prejudice.
Paoletti v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 370 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paoletti v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 370 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In support of its decision the court cited three cases, Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , Bautch v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., and Reid Burton Construction, Inc. v. Carpenters District Council, 614 F.2d 698 (10th Cir.1980), cert.
Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Services Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson 363 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Services Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson 363 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 184 , (“[Rjules [are] limited to governing the procedure in the district courts of this state and [are] not in any respect to legislate where substantive law is involved.”); National Recruiters, (citing Remick v. Clousing, 205 Minn. 29
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The motion should be denied “if under the evidence reasonable men might reach different conclusions.” Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
City of Savage v. Varey 358 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of Savage v. Varey 358 N.W.2d 102 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
A party may waive an arbitration clause if it commences litigation over arbi-trable claims, Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , or defends such claims in a court action, Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc.
VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
VanderLeest v. VanderLeest 352 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Starr v. Starr, 312 Minn. 561 , Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 175
Dalco Corp. v. Dixon 338 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1983
Dalco Corp. v. Dixon 338 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1983
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Nord v. Herreid 305 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1981
Nord v. Herreid 305 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1981
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186 , 2 J. Hetland & O. Adamson, supra at 572.
Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc. 296 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1980
Brothers Jurewicz, Inc. v. Atari, Inc. 296 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 1980
Bautch v. Red Owl Stores, Inc., Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167
Bautch v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1979
Bautch v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 278 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1979
See, Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167 , Skeim v. Independent School Dist.
Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co. 277 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1979
Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co. 277 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1979
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co. 273 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1978
Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Tapemark Co. 273 N.W.2d 630 Minn. 1978
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167, 186
Ellerbrock v. Bd. of Ed., Sp. Sch. Dist. No. 6 269 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
Ellerbrock v. Bd. of Ed., Sp. Sch. Dist. No. 6 269 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
Skeim v. Independent School District No. 115, 305 Minn. 464 , Anderson v. Twin Cities Rapid Transit Co., 250 Minn. 167