Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co., 84 N.W.2d 593.

137 citing documents.

Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier 245 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1976
Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier 245 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1976
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , Independent School Dist.
PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION v. Brown 540 P.2d 651 Ariz. 1975
Forsblad v. Jepson 195 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1972
Forsblad v. Jepson 195 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1972
e. Bearing in mind that Rule 56.03 is designed to dispose of a specious claim in any type of action, Slezak v. Ousdigian, 260 Minn. 303 , and that upon the record submitted by the parties all inferences from circumstantial evidence and all doubts must be re *460 solved, against the movant, without undertaking to determine credibility, Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , we are not persuaded that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment.
A & J BUILDERS INC. v. Harms 179 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1970
A & J BUILDERS INC. v. Harms 179 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 1970
e evidence viewed in the light most favorable to him; and that the motion for summary judgment should be denied if, under the evidence, reasonable men might reach different conclusions (Ahlm v. Rooney, 274 Minn. 259 , 143 N. W. [2d] 65; Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co. 270 Minn. 525 , 134 N. W. [2d] 892; Sauter v. Sauter, 244 Minn. 482 , 70 N. W. [2d] 351; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. [2d] 593), the obvious conclusion, which cannot be avoided, is that the cou
Bolo Corporation v. Homes & Son Construction Co. 464 P.2d 788 Ariz. 1970
City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1969
City of Coon Rapids v. Suburban Engineering, Inc. 167 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1969
Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc. 253 Minn. 418 , 92 N. W. (2d) 96 ; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Donnay v. Boulware, 275 Minn. 37 , 144 N. W. (2d) 711 .
McAllister v. Independent School District No. 306 149 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1967
McAllister v. Independent School District No. 306 149 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1967
In Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167, 184 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593, 604 , we noted that the principle of waiver is applicable to both procedural and substantive law.
Rakness v. Swift and Company 147 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1966
Rakness v. Swift and Company 147 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1966
Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co. 257 Minn. 487 , 102 N. W. (2d) 293 ; Juvland v. Plaisance, 255 Minn. 262 , 96 N. W. (2d) 537 ; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 .
Telex Corporation v. Data Products Corporation 135 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1965
Telex Corporation v. Data Products Corporation 135 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1965
Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Kennedy v. Westinghouse Elec.
Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co. 134 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1965
Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co. 134 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1965
Sauter v. Sauter, 244 Minn. 482 , 70 N. W. (2d) 351 ; Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin, 242 Minn. 416 , 65 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167, 186 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593, 605 .” *532 2.
State v. Birmingham 392 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1964
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc. 128 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1964
See, North Dakota Century Code, § 9-07-21; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 .
Cunningham v. Federal Cartridge Corporation 122 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1963
Cunningham v. Federal Cartridge Corporation 122 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 1963
It is the contention of plaintiff that neither party having invoked grievance procedures, they have been waived by both the employer and employee and may not now be asserted as a defense, citing Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 , and Rowan v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 262 Minn. 366 , 114 N. W. (2d) 692 .
Niazi v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 121 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1963
Niazi v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 121 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1963
See, also, Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 .
Bustad v. Bustad 116 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1962
Bustad v. Bustad 116 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1962
Sauter v. Sauter, 244 Minn. 482 , 70 N. W. (2d) 351 ; Abdallah, Inc. v. Martin, 242 Minn. 416 , 65 N. W. (2d) 641 ; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167, 186 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593, 605 .
Rowan v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 114 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1962
Rowan v. K. W. McKee, Inc. 114 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1962
Co. 225 Minn. 508 , 31 N. W. (2d) 465 ; and *372 Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 .
Albrecht v. Sell 110 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1961
Albrecht v. Sell 110 N.W.2d 895 Minn. 1961
Co. 230 Minn. 308, 311 , 41 N. W. (2d) 422, 424 ; Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167, 181 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593, 603 ; Carlson v. Doran, 252 Minn. 449, 456 , 90 N. W. (2d) 323, 328 ; Alsleben v. Oliver Corp. 254 Minn. 197, 203 , 94 N. W. (2d) 354, 358 ; Colvin Lbr.
Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co. 102 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1960
Anderson v. Mikel Drilling Co. 102 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1960
15 Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 ; 10 Dunnell, Dig.
Wurdemann v. Hjelm 102 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1960
Wurdemann v. Hjelm 102 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1960
2 Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167 , 84 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Tynan v. KSTP, Inc. 247 Minn. 168 , 77 N. W. (2d) 200 ; Phil G. Ruvelson, Inc. v. St.
Meagher v. Kavli 88 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1958
Meagher v. Kavli 88 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1958
It was contended by the parties defendant in Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co. 250 Minn. 167, 184 , 84 N.W.