DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Koenigs v. Werner, 116 N.W.2d 73.

25 citing documents.

  • George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
  • George v. Estate of Baker 724 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
    See also Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80, 85 , (“Here we have an intersection accident where the issue of liability may involve the closely related elements of proximate cause and negligence of the parties.”).
  • Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 2004
  • Clifford v. Geritom Med, Inc. 681 N.W.2d 680 Minn. 2004
    Cf. Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80, 85 , (stating “the practice of permitting a partial new trial should not be followed unless it clearly appears that the issue to be retried is distinct and separable and that the trial of that issue alone may be had without injustice.”).
  • Haugen v. International Transport, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1986
  • Haugen v. International Transport, Inc. 379 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1986
    Satter v. Turner, 257 Minn. 145, 157, Von Bank v. Mayer, 239 Minn. 492, 495 , , 309 *531 (1953); see also Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80, 83-84
  • Haugen v. International Transport, Inc. 364 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Haugen v. International Transport, Inc. 364 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80
  • Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co. 239 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
  • Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co. 239 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
    Cf. Juvland v. Mattson, 289 Minn. 365 , (apportionment issue cannot be retried independently of causal negligence); and Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80 , (concurring opinion) (cause and negligence cannot be bifurcated for new trial).
  • Juvland v. Mattson 184 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1971
  • Merten v. DeZurik 165 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1969
  • Merten v. DeZurik 165 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1969
    See, also, Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73 .
  • Swanson v. Thill 152 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1967
  • Swanson v. Thill 152 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 1967
    See, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Bennett (4 Cir.) 251 F. (2d) 934; cf. Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73 .
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
  • Backman v. Fitch 137 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1965
    Lundblad v. Erickson, 180 Minn. 185 , ; Fortier v. Newman, 248 Minn. 69 , 78 N. W. (2d) 382 ; Propper v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 237 Minn. 386 , 54 N. W. (2d) 840 ; Fussner v. Andert, 261 Minn. 347, 361 , 113 N. W. (2d) 355, 364 ; Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73 .
  • Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
  • Ginsberg v. Williams 135 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1965
    But see, Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80, 84 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73, 76 , where “observations” were expressed on the merits of an order granting a new trial notwithstanding its nonappealability to obviate “further expense and litigation,” and Smith v. Illinois Cent.
  • Koenigs v. Werner 134 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1964
  • Koenigs v. Werner 134 N.W.2d 301 Minn. 1964
    An appeal from this order was dismissed in Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73 , because of our limited power to review orders granting a new trial.
  • Anderson v. Gabrielson 126 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1964
  • Anderson v. Gabrielson 126 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 1964
    1961, § 605.09(4), (now amended by L. 1963, c. 806, § 8); Kubinski v. Speckman, 261 Minn. 475, 477 , 113 N. W. (2d) 173, 174 ; Kelsey v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. 262 Minn. 219 , 114 N. W. (2d) 90 ; Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80, 83 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73, 75 ; Block v. Hall, 263 Minn. 582 , 116 N. W. (2d) 505 ; Poynter v. Albrecht, 266 Minn. 245, 249 , 123 N. W. (2d) 355, 357 .
  • Poynter v. Albrecht 123 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1963
  • Poynter v. Albrecht 123 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1963
    and it may also so order, on appeal from the whole order denying such motion when made in the alternative form, whether a new trial was granted or denied by such order.” 6 Laramie Motors, Inc. v. Larson, 253 Minn. 484, 486 , 92 N. W. (2d) 803, 805 ; Satter v. Turner, 257 Minn. 145, 158 , 100 N. W. (2d) 660, 669 ; Gothe v. Murray, 260 Minn. 181, 188 , 109 N. W. (2d) 350, 354 ; Koenigs v. Werner, 263 Minn. 80, 83 , 116 N. W. (2d) 73, 75 ; Godeen v. Bennett, 265 Minn. 179 , 120 N. W. (2d) 867 .