Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48.

44 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. C. G. and T. A. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, cited by T.A.T., is not analogous to this case because it does not involve either a parent who has a child with serious mental health, educational, and emoti onal special needs or a parent who failed to comply with a case plan designed to equip him with the skills necessary to provide for th
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. and R. D. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. and R. D. S., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, cited by appellant, is not analogous because it did not involve a parent who refuses to remain law abiding despite being given several opportunities to do so.
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
In Re the Welfare of S.F. 482 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of S.F. 482 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
In Re the Welfare of C.K. 426 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1988
See also In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.C. 415 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53-54
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re Welfare of M.J.L. 407 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
This preference for the child’s biological parent requires that “whenever possible the family relationship should be strengthened and preserved.” In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 390 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1986
In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The relationship of the parent and child must be preserved “whenever possible.” In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53 , Minn.Stat.
In Re the Welfare of K.P.C. 366 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of K.P.C. 366 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
There is a preference for the child’s natural parent and “whenever possible the family relationship should be strengthened and preserved.” In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
Matter of Welfare of White 363 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of White 363 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
Toro Co. v. Commissioner of Economic SEC. 356 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of ELH 356 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
Matter of Welfare of Copus 356 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Welfare of Copus 356 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48 , the Minnesota Supreme Court stated: *367 Implicit in the statutes is the policy that whenever possible the family relationship should be strengthened and preserved.
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Welfare of A.K.K. 356 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This court in In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53 , interpreted § 260.221(b)(5) and found: [I]t appears that a proceeding to terminate rights is intended for those situations where it reasonably appears that a condition of dependency or neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.
Matter of Welfare of Chosa 290 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Chosa 290 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1980
We further require that the evidence relating to termination must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing, that the existence of a neglect order alone cannot be the basis for issuance of a termination order, and that it must appear that the present conditions of neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period, In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
Matter of Welfare of Clausen 289 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1980
This court in In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53 , interpreted § 260.221(b)(5) and found: [I]t appears that a proceeding to terminate rights is intended for those situations where it reasonably appears that a condition of dependency or neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.
Petition of Linehan 280 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1979
Petition of Linehan 280 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1979
Subsequently we noted in In re Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 54 , that in spite of prior neglect which was substantial, and past conduct detrimental to a child’s welfare, an assumption that a parent’s claimed rehabilitation was only temporary and unreliable would be pure speculation.
In Re Welfare of Larson 251 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1977
In Re Welfare of Larson 251 N.W.2d 325 Minn. 1977
[5] E. g., In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53
St. Louis County Welfare Department v. Stangle 247 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1976
St. Louis County Welfare Department v. Stangle 247 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1976
260.221(b) (5) in In re Barron, 268 Minn. 48, 53 , and concluded that— “* * * it appears that a proceeding to terminate rights is intended for those situations where it reasonably appears that a condition of dependency or neglect will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.
In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
In Re Alsdurf's Petition 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
Nelson v. Whaley, 246 Minn. 535, 545 , ; In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48 , 127 N.W.
State ex rel. Sadler v. Alsdurf 133 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1965
Nelson v. Whaley, 246 Minn. 535, 545 , 75 N. W. (2d) 786, 792 ; In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48 , 127 N. W. (2d) 702 .
In Re Welfare of Zink 132 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1964
In Re Welfare of Zink 132 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1964
6, to the end that his contentions, availability, or plan regarding the best welfare of the child may be considered by the court, in contrast to any other plan or proposal urged by the mother, any child welfare agencies, or interested parties.” In In re Welfare of Barron, 268 Minn. 48 , 127 N. W. (2d) 702 , we also discussed procedures under § 260.131 to adjudge a child dependent or neglected and under § 260.221 to terminate parental rights.