Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 126 N.W.2d 766.

38 citing documents.

The CastleRock Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
25, 2001); (“The necessary prerequisite to the right to maintain a suit for an equitable accounting .
Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
the absence of an adequate remedy at law.” (quotation omitted).
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp. 831 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Giersdorf v. A & M Construction, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 2012
Giersdorf v. A & M Construction, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 2012
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326-27 , (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted) (stating that the *22 “nature and character of the controversy” determines whether there is a right to a jury trial under Article I, Section 4 of the Minnesota Constitution); see also Sellers v. Brown, 633 F.2d 106, 108 (8th Cir
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
See 267 Minn. 323, 324-26 , -68 (1964).
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 782 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
Abraham v. County of Hennepin 639 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2002
See Rognrud v. Zubert, 282 Minn. 430, 434 , (concluding that causes of action that are legal, as opposed to equitable, are entitled to jury trial); Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 327 , (concluding that suit on contract to recover money is legal action, and as such, triable to jury); Westerlund v. Peterson, 157 Minn. 379, 384 , 197 N.W.
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Co. v. Village of Watertown, 283 Minn. 505, 509 , Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 329
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 505 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1993
Whether 'there is a right to a jury trial is determined by “the nature and character of the controversy, determined from all of the pleadings.” Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326 , (nature and character of the controversy is determined from pleadings and that determination governs the right to a jury trial).
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Tyroll v. Private Label Chemicals, Inc. 493 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. 490 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
Uselman v. Uselman 464 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1990
See Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 327 , see also Sina v. Schifsky, 296 Minn. 528, 529 , -04 (1973).
Schreiner v. Schmitz 418 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Schreiner v. Schmitz 418 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Olson v. Aretz 346 N.W.2d 178 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323, 326
Spannaus v. Arrowood 230 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1975
In Re Estate of Bush 230 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1975
In Re Estate of Bush 230 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1975
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323 , Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409
Spannaus v. Arrowood 230 N.W.2d 33 Minn. 1975
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323 , Breimhorst v. Beckman, 227 Minn. 409
Parsons Electric Co. v. Village of Watertown 169 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1969
Parsons Electric Co. v. Village of Watertown 169 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1969
Co. v. Kruse, 121 Minn. 28 , ; Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323 , 126 N. W. (2d) 766 ; and Rules 38.01 and 38.02, Rules of Civil Procedure, which provide as follows: 38.01.
Johnson v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
Johnson v. Johnson 137 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 1965
Landgraf v. Ellsworth, 267 Minn. 323 , 126 N. W. (2d) 766 , should be distinguished.