DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Smith, 119 N.W.2d 838.

39 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-Bond Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Camille Lashay Dennis-Bond Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    d 838, 848-49 (Minn. 1962) (applying the substantial-factor test and proximate-cause principles to a previous version of the third-degree murder statute); 2 State v. Jaworsky, 505 2 We are not aware of any court applying the proximate-cause or substantial-factor test to the cause element of third-degree murder under se
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    efendant is guilty of causing the death of another, the State must prove the defendant’s acts were a substantial causal factor leading to the death.” (quotation omitted)); (concluding that the defendant’s acts were a “substantial causal factor” because the defendant’s conduct “set in motion the events” leading to death); State v. Smith , 264 Minn. 307, 320-21, (indicating that proximate cause is satisfied if the defendant’s acts “were a contributory cause” of death (quotation omitted)).
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    See State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 322, (affirming homicide conviction 10 when issue of causation properly submitted to jury); see also Jaworsky, d at 643 (affirming conviction when question of causation submitted to jury); (same), review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 313
  • State v. Smith 835 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
  • State v. Smith 835 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
    See State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 320 , (holding that the State proved causation even though the defendant’s “ ‘acts were not the immediate cause of death’ ” (quoting State v. Rounds, 104 Vt. 442 , 160 A. 249, 252 (1932))).
  • State v. Heiges 806 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Heiges 806 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2011
    ”); State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 313 , (“A confession involves the idea of criminality.
  • State v. HEIGES 779 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
  • State v. HEIGES 779 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
    See State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 313 , (stating a confession refers “only to a direct or implied acknowledgment of guilt, after an offense [was] committed”); see also State v. Johnson, 277 Minn. 230, 235 , (stating that a confession is a party’s acknowledgment “of his guilt of the crime charged”)
  • State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Jaworsky 505 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 321
  • State v. Olson 435 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Olson 435 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 1989
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 318-22 , -49 (1962).
  • State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Torkelson 404 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 318-19 , -48 (1962)
  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307, 321
  • State v. King 367 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. King 367 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307 , -48 (1962), quoting State v. Francis, 152 S.C.
  • State v. Vaughn 361 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Vaughn 361 N.W.2d 54 Minn. 1985
    See State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307
  • State v. Fratzke 325 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Fratzke 325 N.W.2d 10 Minn. 1982
    Compare State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307 , State v. McClendon, 172 Minn. 106 , 214 N.W.
  • State v. Berry 309 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Berry 309 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1981
    See State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307
  • Tucker v. State 245 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1976
  • Tucker v. State 245 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1976
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307 , State v. Hopfe, 249 Minn. 464 , State v. Els-berg, 209 Minn. 167
  • State v. Reed 192 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Reed 192 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1971
    634.04; State v. Mathiasen, 267 Minn. 393 , State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307
  • State v. Boykin 172 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Boykin 172 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1969
    According to State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307 , 119 N. W. (2d) 838 , an accomplice is one who cooperates, aids, or assists another in the commission of a crime, either as principal or as accessory.
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
  • State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
    State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307 , 119 N. W. (2d) 838 .
  • State v. Mitchell 130 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Mitchell 130 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1964
    The material facts as they appear in the record are substantially the same as those stated in State v. Smith, 264 Minn. 307 , 119 N. W. (2d) 838 , which affirms the conviction of defendant Smith, who was tried separately.