Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jallen v. Agre, 119 N.W.2d 739.

50 citing documents.

Danielle DePietto, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bradley Hammond, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Andrew Cusick, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
or could have been made.” Third, Demo argues that the parties’ dis pute about the scope of the claims settled “evidences no meeting of the minds necessary to form an enforceable agreement.” A “full and enforceable settlement” requires “a definite offer and acceptance [so] that it can be said that there has been a meeting of the minds on the essential terms of the agreement.” (Mi nn.
Paul Stepnes, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Scott H. Lansing, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
or otherwise reduced to writing so as to prevent a dispute as to what the terms of the settlement are.”
Daniel D. Oberpriller, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To constitute a full and enforceable settlement, there must be such a definite offer and acceptance that it can be said that there has been a meeting of the minds on the essential terms of the agreement.” Jallen v. Agre , (footnote omitted).
A18-1408 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“To constitute a full and enforceable settlement, there must be such a definite offer and acceptance that it can be said that there has been a meeting of the minds on the essential terms of the agreement.” Jallen v. Agre , (footnote omitted).
Zahn Law Firm, P.A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Sandquist Steaks, Inc. , 309 Minn. 408, 410, Jallen v. Agre , 264 Minn. 369, 373
Estate of: Steven C. Kukowski, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
In re: the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008 In re: the Eugene … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Settlement agreements are favored by law, and are enforced “absent fraud or collusion, mistake, or such an improvident agreement that it ought not to stand in equity and good conscience.” Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373, - 43 (1963).
Discover Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
Elizabeth Rocco v. Imran Khan, and third party v. Patrick J. Eastwood, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Elizabeth Rocco v. Imran Khan, and third party v. Patrick J. Eastwood, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Sandquist Steaks, Inc., 309 Minn. 408, 410, Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“To constitute a full and enforceable settlement, there must be such a definite offer and acceptance that it can be said that there has been a meeting of the minds on the essential terms of the agreement.” Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Richard J. Hartfiel v. Raymond Wilburn Allison, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 100–01 (citing Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373, ).
Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2008
Voicestream Minneapolis, Inc. v. RPC Properties, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 2008
Mr. Steak, Inc. v. Sandquist Steaks, Inc., 309 Minn. 408, 410 , Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLC 677 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
Minnesota Humane Society v. Minnesota Federated Humane Societies 611 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Minnesota Humane Society v. Minnesota Federated Humane Societies 611 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369 , 373 -43 (1963) (a definite settlement of a lawsuit is contractual in nature and will be enforced).
Moundson v. Bitzan 588 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Moundson v. Bitzan 588 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Cf. Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , (settlements are contractual in nature, and to be enforceable must include definite offer and acceptance).
Wildman v. K-Mart Corp. 556 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Wildman v. K-Mart Corp. 556 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Schumann v. Northtown Insurance Agency, Inc. 452 N.W.2d 482 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , quoted in Ghostley v. Hetland, 295 Minn. 376, 378
Russo v. Tilleraas 389 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Russo v. Tilleraas 389 N.W.2d 253 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
It is settled that a definite settlement “will be enforced, absent fraud or collusion, mistake, or such an improvident agreement that it ought not to stand in equity and good conscience.” Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , -43 (1963).
Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc. 376 N.W.2d 434 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The settlement of a lawsuit is “contractual in nature,” Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , therefore, before a settlement is reached there must first be an offer and acceptance, resulting in a meeting of the parties’ minds.
Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. Perkins 364 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Speckel Ex Rel. Speckel v. Perkins 364 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
Anderson v. Blair 358 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Anderson v. Blair 358 N.W.2d 708 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373
Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve Insurance 238 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1976
Continental Casualty Co. v. Reserve Insurance 238 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1976
3 Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , 3B Dunnell, Dig.
Ghostley v. Hetland 204 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1973
Ghostley v. Hetland 204 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1973
As we said in Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , : “It is not essential to the enforcement of an agreement to settle a case that the agreement be in writing unless it is within the statute of frauds, but the terms of the settlement should normally be stated to the court and taken down by the reporter or otherwise reduced to writin
Ryan v. Ryan 193 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1971
Ryan v. Ryan 193 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1971
Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369 , Held v. Keller, 135 Minn. 192 , Theis v. Theis, 271 Minn. 199 , 15A C. J. S., Compromise and Settlement, § 7(1); 15 Am.
Simons v. Schiek's, Inc. 145 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1966
Theis v. Theis 135 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1965
Theis v. Theis 135 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1965
ompromise and Settlement, § 21: “* * * [A] valid compromise and settlement is final, conclusive, and binding upon the parties; it is as binding as any contract the parties could make, and as binding as if its terms were embodied in a judgment; and, regardless of what the actual merits of the antecedent claim may have been, they will not afterward be inquired into and examined.” In Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , 119 N. W. (2d) 739, 743 , we said: “A compromise settlement of a lawsuit is con
Jallen v. Agre 122 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1963
Jallen v. Agre 122 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 1963
This is a petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to comply with the mandate of this court in the decision in Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369 , 119 N. W. (2d) 739 .
Eggleston v. Keller Drug Co. 120 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1963
Eggleston v. Keller Drug Co. 120 N.W.2d 305 Minn. 1963
1 In Jallen v. Agre, 264 Minn. 369, 373 , 119 N. W. (2d) 739, 742 , we said: “* * * There can be no doubt that a definite settlement of a lawsuit, under our decisions, will be enforced, absent fraud or collusion, mistake, or such an improvident agreement that it ought not to stand in equity and good conscience.