Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 122 N.W.2d 26.

199 citing documents.

In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 517 N.W.2d 63 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Northern States Power v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Corporate Financers, Inc. v. Voyageur Trading Co. 519 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Corporate Financers, Inc. v. Voyageur Trading Co. 519 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Basich, d at 295 (citing Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 394 , ).
Geldert v. American National Bank 506 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Geldert v. American National Bank 506 N.W.2d 22 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Trust Created by Hill 499 N.W.2d 475 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (dismissal is proper if it appears to a certainty no facts consistent with the pleading could be introduced to support the claim).
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 494 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1992
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 494 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1992
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Basich v. Board of Pensions 493 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Basich v. Board of Pensions 493 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 394
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Kryzer v. Champlin American Legion No. 600 481 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Schocker v. State, Department of Human Rights 477 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Schocker v. State, Department of Human Rights 477 N.W.2d 767 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“[A] pleading will be dismissed only if it appears to a certainty that no facts * * * exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , (footnote omitted).
Radloff v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud, N.A. 455 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Radloff v. First American National Bank of St. Cloud, N.A. 455 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See, -68 (Minn.1989) (discrimination in employment); Northern States Power Company v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 397 , -31 (1963) (trespass).
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Distinguished Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The trial court supported its statement by citing Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391 , a property trespass case.
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391
Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Searles v. Searles 412 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The limited function served by such a motion to dismiss was reiterated in Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , : A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss based on Rule 12.02(5) if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief *13 demanded.
Mendota Heights Associates v. Friel 414 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Mendota Heights Associates v. Friel 414 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(quoting Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Pederson v. American Lutheran Church 404 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pederson v. American Lutheran Church 404 N.W.2d 887 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391
Bush v. City of Lakefield 399 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bush v. City of Lakefield 399 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 396
Diedrich v. State 393 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Diedrich v. State 393 N.W.2d 677 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Elzie, d at 32 (citing Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , ).
Sifferle v. Micom Corp. 384 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Sifferle v. Micom Corp. 384 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391
Brakke v. Hilgers 374 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Brakke v. Hilgers 374 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
The limited function served by such a motion to dismiss was reiterated in Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , : A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss based on Rule 12.02(5) if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.
Hedlund v. Hedlund 371 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hedlund v. Hedlund 371 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Although the court’s conclusion is true, it is also true that pleadings should be dismissed “only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” Northern States Power Company v. *235 Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Juster Steel v. Carlson Companies 366 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Juster Steel v. Carlson Companies 366 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391
North Star Legal Foundation v. Honeywell Project 355 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
North Star Legal Foundation v. Honeywell Project 355 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety 298 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1980
Elzie v. Commissioner of Public Safety 298 N.W.2d 29 Minn. 1980
The limited function served by such a motion to dismiss was reiterated in Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395 , : A claim is sufficient against a motion to dismiss based on Rule 12.02(5) if it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.
Abbariao v. Hamline University School of Law 258 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1977
Abbariao v. Hamline University School of Law 258 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1977
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P. 216 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1974
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P. 216 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1974
Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391
Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of America 150 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1967
Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of America 150 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1967
1 See, Rule 12.03, Rules of Civil Procedure; Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391 , 122 N. W. (2d) 26 ; Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143 , 89 N. W. (2d) 398 ; Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern Nat.