DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Biron, 123 N.W.2d 392.

63 citing documents.

  • In the Appeal of Jared Cunningham re: DHS Appeal for Maltreatment of a Minor. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • State of Minnesota v. Jonas David Nelson 886 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Jonas David Nelson 886 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2016
    See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 283, (concluding that a confession was inadmissible when an officer implied that the defendant would be tried as a juvenile only if he confessed).
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox 884 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox 884 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 2016
    See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
  • State v. Zabawa 787 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Zabawa 787 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 2010
    State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
  • State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Farnsworth 738 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 2007
    266 Minn. 272, 277-78, 282 , 399 (1963).
  • State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Heath 685 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
  • In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • In Re the Welfare of D.B.X. 638 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    See, (police improperly suggested to juvenile defendant that they had influence with county attorney and could arrange for counseling or reduced charge if mitigating circumstances existed); Ga rner, d at 727 (interrogating officer, among other things, lied to accused); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , (police made promises that “could only have had the effect of implanting” hope that accused would be treated with leniency); D.S.N., d at 815 (police officer suggested county attorney would pro
  • In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • In Re the Welfare of D.S.N. 611 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    ary where police representations to 20-year-old implied defendant would receive treatment, rather than prosecution, if he confessed), review denied (Minn. June 25, 1987); , 468 (Minn. App.1984) (confession involuntary where police implied no charges would be brought, and defendant would instead receive counseling, if the defendant confessed); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , (confession involuntary where police statements and-representations to 18-year-old were persuasive and “could only hav
  • Zellman Ex Rel. M.Z. v. Independent School District No. 2758 594 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Zellman Ex Rel. M.Z. v. Independent School District No. 2758 594 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
  • State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
    568 (1897); -11 (Minn.1995); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282
  • State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
    “ ‘[T]he trustworthiness of a confession should not in every instance be discounted because investigative officers in their interviews might have made discursive or imprecise statements to the defendant.’ ” d at 107 (quoting State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , ).
  • State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Thaggard 527 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1995
    2d 344 (Minn.1984) (promise to release defendant pending formal charging and to summon him rather than arrest him on a warrant did not render defendant’s confession “involuntary”); State v. [Kevin] Anderson, (promise to a defendant that a female friend would be released from jail if he gave a written statement did not render his confession “involuntary”); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (holding “involuntary” a confession obtained from an 18-year-old who was promised juvenile treatment if he con
  • State v. Ostrem 520 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • State v. Ostrem 520 N.W.2d 426 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    See State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 281
  • State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280 , (quoting State v. Staley, 14 Minn. 75, 79-80 (1869)).
  • McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
  • McDonnell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 473 N.W.2d 848 Minn. 1991
    See id.; see also State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (police officer’s misrepresentations of law intended to induce confession violated due process).
  • State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Slowinski 450 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1990
    The facts of the instant case are not like those in State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
  • State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Shamp 422 N.W.2d 736 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    “[T]he trustworthiness of a confession should not in every instance be discounted because investigative officers * * * in their interviews might have made discursive or imprecise statements to the defendant.” State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , -01 (Minn.1979), cert.
  • State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282 , -68 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
  • State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1986
    (promise to release defendant pending formal charging and to summon him rather than arrest him on a warrant did not render defendant’s confession “involuntary”); (promise to a defendant that a female friend would be released from jail if he gave a written statement did not render his confession “involuntary”); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (holding “involuntary” a confession obtained from a 18-year-old who was promised juvenile treatment if he confessed).
  • State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Cf. State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , (involuntary confession when induced by promises of special treatment).
  • State v. Gard 358 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Gard 358 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    1336, 1342-43 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280
  • State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Jensen 349 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    1336, 1342 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963); State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280
  • Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
  • Matter of Welfare of M.D.S. 345 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1984
    The leading case in Minnesota with regard to this issue is State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
  • State v. Orscanin 283 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Orscanin 283 N.W.2d 897 Minn. 1979
    See, State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
  • State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
    at 1343 , 10 L.Ed.2d at 521 ; State v. Raymond, 305 Minn. 160, 174 , State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 282
  • State v. Reilly 269 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1978