Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Biron, 123 N.W.2d 392.

63 citing documents.

  • State v. Reilly 269 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1978
    See, State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272
  • State v. Orscanin 266 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Orscanin 266 N.W.2d 880 Minn. 1978
    See, State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , A. L. I., Model Code of Prearraignment Procedure, § 150.2(8) and Note.
  • State v. Raymond 232 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Raymond 232 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1975
    See also Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U. S. 568, 605 (1961) (opinion of Frankfurter, J.).” A similar vein of thought runs through this court’s opinion in State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272, 280 , where Mr. Justice Murphy stated: “Moreover, it is important for us to keep in mind that since the issue before us involves a basic constitutional right the standards upon which the issue of voluntariness must be appraised are those expressed by decisions of the United States Suprem
  • State v. Ahlstrand 179 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Ahlstrand 179 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1970
    See, also, In re Gault, 387 U. S. 1 , 87 S. Ct. 1428 , 18 L. ed. (2d) 527; Kent v. United States, 383 U. S. 541 , 86 S. Ct. 1045 , 16 L. ed. (2d) 84; Harrison v. United States, 123 App. D. C. 230, 359 F. (2d) 214; State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , 123 N. W. (2d) 392 ; State v. Shaw, 93 Ariz. 40 , 378 P. (2d) 487 ; and Standards for Specialized Courts Dealing with Children, Children’s Bureau, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, pp. 38-39, quoted in Harling v. United States, 111 App. D. C.
  • State v. Carlson 158 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1968
  • State v. Carlson 158 N.W.2d 199 Minn. 1968
    Defendant relies on Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U. S. 1 , 84 S. Ct. 1489 , 12 L. ed. (2d) 653; Haynes v. Washington, 373 U. S. 503 , 83 S. Ct. 1336 , 10 L. ed. (2d) 513; Lynumn v. Illinois, 372 U. S. 528 , 83 S. Ct. 917 , 9 L. ed. (2d) 922; and State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , 123 N. W. (2d) 392 .
  • State v. Pooley 153 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Pooley 153 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1967
    Defendant contends that the confession was involuntary because obtained by means of unfulfilled assurances, State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , 123 N. W. (2d) 392 ; and thát the guilty plea was interposed because of his genuine misapprehension that the confession could be used against him if he stood trial.
  • State v. Kobi 151 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1967
  • State v. Kobi 151 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1967
    State v. Biron, 266 Minn. 272 , 123 N. W. (2d) 392 ; State v. Taylor, 270 Minn. 333 , 133 N. W. (2d) 828 ; State ex rel.