Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Finden v. Klaas, 128 N.W.2d 748.

213 citing documents.

Peterson v. Skutt Ceramic Products, Inc. 417 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 272
Banque Internationale Luxembourg v. Dacotah Companies 413 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Banque Internationale Luxembourg v. Dacotah Companies 413 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nielsen Stock & Blackburn, Ltd. v. Financial Acceptance Corporation, Inc., 299 Minn. 81, 85 , Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268
Nelson v. Siebert 411 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Siebert 411 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Finden v. Klacts, 268 Minn. 268, 271-72 , -51 (1964); pet.
McKay v. Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
McKay v. Boyer Ford Trucks, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271-72 , -51 (1964) (party entitled to relief under rule 60.02 where record fails to show that party was aware of attorney’s neglect).
Schulz v. Milam 410 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Schulz v. Milam 410 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
E.g. Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268
Soderling v. Hickok 409 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
C & a Enterprises v. Carlson Tractor & Equipment Co. 408 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peterson v. Texas Terrace Convalescent Center 408 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Soderling v. Hickok 409 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271-72 , -51 (1964); pet.
C & a Enterprises v. Carlson Tractor & Equipment Co. 408 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271-72 , -51 (1964).
Peterson v. Texas Terrace Convalescent Center 408 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271
Charson v. Temple Israel 405 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Charson v. Temple Israel 405 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271
Arnold Johnsen Decorators, Inc. v. Holmbeck & Associates, Inc. 408 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Armstrong v. Heckman 409 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Armstrong v. Heckman 409 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271
Arnold Johnsen Decorators, Inc. v. Holmbeck & Associates, Inc. 408 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 272
Reardon Office Equipment v. Nelson 409 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Reardon Office Equipment v. Nelson 409 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. *225 268, 271
Rose v. Neubauer 407 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Rose v. Neubauer 407 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 272
Lund v. Pan American MacHines Sales 405 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lund v. Pan American MacHines Sales 405 N.W.2d 550 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Reasonable Excuse Initially, we note that since the case of Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , Minnesota courts have found reliance on an attorney’s assurances to be a reasonable excuse for failure to act.
Valley View, Inc. v. Schutte 399 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Valley View, Inc. v. Schutte 399 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 272 , See Minn.R.Civ.P.
Gelco Corp. v. Crystal Leasing, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gelco Corp. v. Crystal Leasing, Inc. 396 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271
Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department Ex Rel. Edwardh v. Swanson 394 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Isanti County Family Services & Welfare Department Ex Rel. Edwardh v. Swanson 394 N.W.2d 180 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
y’s neglect in those cases where defendant— “ * * * (a) is possessed of a reasonable defense on the merits, (b) has a reasonable excuse for his failure or neglect to answer, (c) has acted with due diligence after notice of the entry of judgment, and (d) [shows] that no substantial prejudice will result to the other party.” (quoting Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , ).
Ayers v. Rudolph's, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Ayers v. Rudolph's, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
The Conley court relied on Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , an action in which default judgment was entered against the defendant after his attorney failed to answer the complaint, respond to the note of issue, or respond to a letter notifying him of the plaintiff’s intention to submit the case as a default.
Gunderson v. Lake County Board of Health 389 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gunderson v. Lake County Board of Health 389 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
at 40 (quoting Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , ).
Howard v. Frondell 387 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Howard v. Frondell 387 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271
Stelflug v. Benson 385 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Stelflug v. Benson 385 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , (footnote omitted).
Pelletier Corp. v. Chas. M. Freidheim Co. 383 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pelletier Corp. v. Chas. M. Freidheim Co. 383 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , (vacating a default judgment); (vacating a summary judgment).
Thomas v. Fey 376 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thomas v. Fey 376 N.W.2d 266 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268
Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1985
Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1985
See also Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244 , Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , Sommers v. Thomas, 251 Minn. 461 , In re Application of Bonley, 213 Minn. 214 , Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co., 99 Minn. 272 , 109 N.W.
Marriage of King v. Carroll 356 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of King v. Carroll 356 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
3 J. Hetland & O. Adamson, Minnesota Practice 278 (1970) (citing Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , LaFond v. Sczepanski, 273 Minn. 293 , ).
State v. $14,000 Dollars in Various Denominations of United States Currency 345 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1984