Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Finden v. Klaas, 128 N.W.2d 748.

213 citing documents.

State v. $14,000 Dollars in Various Denominations of United States Currency 345 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268
Boulevard Del, Inc. v. Stillman 343 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Boulevard Del, Inc. v. Stillman 343 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , (emphasis added).
Conley v. Downing 321 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
Conley v. Downing 321 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
In Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , a default judgment was entered against the defendant after his attorney failed to answer the complaint, respond to the note of issue, or respond to a letter notifying him of the plaintiff’s intention to submit the case as a default.
Hengel v. Hyatt 252 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1977
Hengel v. Hyatt 252 N.W.2d 105 Minn. 1977
See, Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268
Nielsen, Stock & Blackburn v. Financial Acceptance Corp. of Minnesota, Inc. 216 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1974
Nielsen, Stock & Blackburn v. Financial Acceptance Corp. of Minnesota, Inc. 216 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1974
Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , Pasich v. Polga, 112 Minn. 510
Kosloski v. Jones 203 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1973
Kosloski v. Jones 203 N.W.2d 401 Minn. 1973
should relieve a defendant from the consequences of his attor *180 ney’s neglect in those cases where defendant (a) is possessed of a reasonable defense on the merits, (b) has a reasonable excuse for his failure or neglect to answer, (c) has acted with due diligence after notice of the entry of judgment, and (d) shows that no substantial prejudice will result to the other party, Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , ; Johnson v. Nelson, 265 Minn. 71 , Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co. 237 Mi
Independent School District No. 273 v. Gross 190 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1971
Independent School District No. 273 v. Gross 190 N.W.2d 651 Minn. 1971
79 F. Supp. 217 ; Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , 128 N. W. (2d) 748 ; O’Kelley v. Alexander, 225 Ga.