Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Larson-Roberts Electric Co., Inc. v. Burdick, 127 N.W.2d 163.

33 citing documents.

Accredited Electrical Solutions, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Cheri Glassick v. Wells Federal Bank, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Northwest Title Agency, Inc., Tim Breuer, Manufacturers Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cheri Glassick v. Wells Federal Bank, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Northwest Title Agency, Inc., Tim Breuer, Manufacturers Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489
Bolen v. Glass 737 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bolen v. Glass 737 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(“Like other property rights, the right of reasonable access can be infringed or ‘taken’ by the state, giving the property owner a constitutional right to compensation.”); Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 486, 445-46 , -73 (1964) (“If the jury decides that the location of the proposed interchange substantially impairs plaintiffs’ right to reasonably convenient and suitable access to the main thoroughfare, plaintiffs are entitled to damages.”).
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Franklin v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 558 N.W.2d 277 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489
Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg 374 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg 374 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Minnesota, in awarding attorney’s fees, there must be “a determination of reasonable value based upon proof thereof or the court’s observation of the services performed.” Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489
Marriage of Andersen v. Andersen 374 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Andersen v. Andersen 374 N.W.2d 499 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486
Nelson v. Ninneman 373 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson v. Ninneman 373 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Although an award of reasonable attorneys fees may be based upon the court’s observation of the services performed, Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489 , the court here directed an application detailing the fees claimed.
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Marriage of Hortis v. Hortis 367 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
This court has stated: In Minnesota, in awarding attorney’s fees, there must be “a determination of reasonable value based upon proof thereof or the court’s observation of the services performed.” (quoting Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489 , ).
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Marriage of Dahlberg v. Dahlberg 358 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This court has stated: In Minnesota, in awarding attorney’s fees, there must be “a determination of reasonable value based upon proof thereof or the court’s observation of the services performed.” (quoting Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489 , ).
Katz & Lange, Ltd. v. Beugen 356 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Katz & Lange, Ltd. v. Beugen 356 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Minnesota, in awarding attorney’s fees, there must be “a determination of reasonable value based upon proof thereof or the court’s observation of the services performed.” Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489
Ryan v. Bigos Properties Ex Rel. Bigos 351 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Ryan v. Bigos Properties Ex Rel. Bigos 351 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Nonetheless, a court’s determination of reasonableness must be based either upon its observation of the services performed or proof of their value, Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486 , and the findings must be reasonably supported by the evidence.
In Re the Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg 350 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg 350 N.W.2d 421 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Minnesota, in awarding attorney’s fees, there must be “a determination of reasonable value based upon proof thereof or the court’s observation of the services performed.” Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486, 489
Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co. 349 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co. 349 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Larson-Roberts Electric Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486
Obraske v. Woody 199 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1972
O'DONNELL v. McGee Trucks, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1972
O'DONNELL v. McGee Trucks, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1972
Defendant calls our attention to Bierlein v. Gagnon, 255 Minn. 143 , and Larson-Roberts Electric Co. Inc. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486 , to support this contention.
Obraske v. Woody 199 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 1972
Schmoll v. Lucht, 106 Minn. 188 , Bierlein v. Gagnon, 255 Minn. 143 , Larson-Roberts Electric Co. Inc. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486
R & L Lumber Co. v. Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. 170 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1969
R & L Lumber Co. v. Summit Fidelity & Surety Co. 170 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1969
Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486 , 127 N. W. (2d) 163 .
Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1967
Tracy v. PERKINS-TRACY PRINTING COMPANY 153 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1967
Co. v. Burdick, 267 Minn. 486 , 127 N. W. (2d) 163 ; In re Mill City Plastics (D. Minn.) 129 F. Supp. 86 .