Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Miller v. Raaen, 139 N.W.2d 877.

33 citing documents.

Joseph Kurian, individually, and as Trustee for Samael Alessandro Ittyerah, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(summarizing cases where expert testimony was unnecessary because they “involved situations where there was no doubt about the cause of the result complained of, and the result would not have followed in the absence of a breach of duty, the establishment of which did not involve any scientific k
Mary Beth Davidson v. North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North Memorial Medical Center, and d/b/a North Memorial Ambulance … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Mary Beth Davidson v. North Memorial Health Care, d/b/a North Memorial Medical Center, and d/b/a North Memorial Ambulance … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
273 Minn. 109, 114-15, (citations omitted).
Tousignant v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MN 615 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 2000
Tousignant v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MN 615 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 2000
Co., see also Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 114 , (stating that in medical malpractice cases, “recovery without expert testimony may be permitted”).
Leuer v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Leuer v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
This distinction was repeated in Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 118-19
Bauer v. Friedland 394 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bauer v. Friedland 394 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 113
Olson Ex Rel. Olson v. St. Joseph's Hospital 281 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1979
Olson Ex Rel. Olson v. St. Joseph's Hospital 281 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1979
In reaching its conclusion, the trial court relied on a number of Minnesota decisions, including Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , Wallstedt v. Swedish Hospital,” 220 Minn. 274 , and Collings v. Northwestern Hospital, 202 Minn. 139 , 277 N.W.
Larsen v. Yelle 246 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1976
Larsen v. Yelle 246 N.W.2d 841 Minn. 1976
Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 113
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
City of Eveleth v. Ruble 225 N.W.2d 521 Minn. 1974
Co. 361 U. S. 354 , 80 S. Ct. 387 , 4 L. ed. 2d 366 (1960); Hestbeck v. Hennepin County, 297 Minn. 419 , Silver v. Redleaf, 292 Minn. 463 , Swanson v. Chatterton, supra; Schulz v. Feigal, supra; Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , Jensen v. Linner, supra; Wallstedt v. Swedish Hospital, 220 Minn. 274 , Quickstad v. Tavenner, supra; Johnson v. Arndt, 186 Minn. 253 , Heffter v. Northern States Power Co. 173 Minn. 215 , Berkholz v. Benepe, 153 Minn. 335
Hestbeck v. Hennepin County 212 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1973
Hestbeck v. Hennepin County 212 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1973
See, Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109
Larson v. Belzer Clinic 195 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1972
Larson v. Belzer Clinic 195 N.W.2d 416 Minn. 1972
The rule as it applies to malpractice cases was exhaustively considered in Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109
Silver v. Redleaf 194 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1972
Silver v. Redleaf 194 N.W.2d 271 Minn. 1972
See, Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 114 , but we are persuaded that the situation here does not constitute such an exception to the usual rule.
Miller v. Tongen 161 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1968
Miller v. Tongen 161 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1968
Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877 ; Hoffman v. Naslund, 274 Minn. 521 , 144 N. W. (2d) 580 .
Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Chatterton 160 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1968
Swanson Ex Rel. Swanson v. Chatterton 160 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1968
In all of the cases where we have held that a recovery may be permitted without expert testimony, as summarized in Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109, 115 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877, 880 , “there was no doubt about the cause of the result complained of, and the result would not have followed in the absence of a breach of duty, the establishment of which did not involve any scientific knowledge.” 3 Fritz v. Parke Davis & Co. 277 Minn. 210 , 152 N. W. (2d) 129 ; Hoffma
McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
McCormack v. Hankscraft Company 154 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1967
See, e. g., Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877 ; Ericksen v. Wilson, 266 Minn. 401 , 123 N. W. (2d) 687 .
Fritz v. Parke Davis and Company 152 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1967
Fritz v. Parke Davis and Company 152 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1967
4 Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877 .
Hoffman v. Naslund 144 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
Hoffman v. Naslund 144 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
Harju v. Allen, 146 Minn. 23 , ; Martin v. Courtney, 75 Minn. 255 , ; Yates v. Gamble, 198 Minn. 7 , ; Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877 .
Schulz v. Feigal 142 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1966
Schulz v. Feigal 142 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1966
They are gathered and reviewed in the recent decision of Miller v. Raaen, 273 Minn. 109 , 139 N. W. (2d) 877 , which involved asserted negligence on the part of an anesthesiologist in administering an anesthetic which infiltrated the tissues of the patient’s hand, causing damage.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by