Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Peters, 143 N.W.2d 832.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“[W]here the record justifies the conclusion that the defendant’s plea was voluntarily and knowingly made, the defendant cannot expect to obtain relief on a claim that the trial court did not inform him of all possible defenses.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, e.g. , State v. Barner , (determining that victim suffered great bodily harm for purpose of assault statute where he sustained a head injury, multiple stab wounds, and injuries to his hands); (affirming aggravated -assault conviction and fin ding great bodily harm where victim was pistol-whipped and shot in shoulder).
State v. Stevenson 637 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
State v. Stevenson 637 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 316 , (stating that a factfinder may infer that a defendant intended the natural and probable consequences of his act).
State v. Basting 572 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1997
State v. Basting 572 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1997
Born, 280 Minn. at 307 , d at 284 (quoting State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 317 , ).
State v. Barner 510 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1993
State v. Barner 510 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 1993
8, defines “great bodily harm” as “bodily injury which creates a high probability of death, or which causes serious permanent disfigurement, or which causes a permanent or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ or other serious bodily harm.” Relevant decisions of this court include: State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309
McConnell v. City of Mankato 456 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
McConnell v. City of Mankato 456 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 316 , (intentions are determined by “outward manifestations”).
State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hemmings 371 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 316
Gilles v. State 216 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1974
Gilles v. State 216 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1974
As this court stated in State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 316 , “[W]here a defendant in a criminal case who was represented by competent counsel enters a plea of guilty to a charge *161 contained in an information filed against him, the general rule is that he waives all defenses other than that the information charges no offense.” For specific
State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309
State v. Granroth 200 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1972
State v. Granroth 200 N.W.2d 397 Minn. 1972
The court’s addition was presumably lifted from our language in State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
Chapman v. State 162 N.W.2d 698 Minn. 1968
Turner v. Tahash, 279 Minn. 359 , 156 N. W. (2d) 904 ; State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309 , 143 N. W. (2d) 832 ; State v. Ingram, 273 Minn. 356 , 141 N. W. (2d) 802 .
State v. Born 159 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1968
State v. Born 159 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1968
This case involved considerably more than a “mere injury by fist, such as is likely to occur in ordinary assault and battery,” to which a passing reference is made in State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 317 , 143 N. W. (2d) 832, 837 .
State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
The *389 conclusiveness of a plea of guilty under the circumstances presented by this record has been defined by this court in State v. Peters, 274 Minn. 309, 316 , 143 N. W. (2d) 832 , 837: “* * * [W]here a defendant in a criminal case who is represented by competent counsel enters a plea of guilty to a charge contained in an information filed against him, the general rule is that he waives all defenses other than that the information charges no offense.” We also said in