DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bonga, 153 N.W.2d 127.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Sidney Phillip Monette Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota v. Sidney Phillip Monette Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    7) (explaining that the defendant was charged with aggravated robbery after he beat a gas station attendant while trying to steal money from the register); (explaining that “[a] man, later identified as [the defendant], walked into the hotel with his right hand in his jacket pocket and said to [a desk clerk], ‘This is a stickup’”); (explaining that the defendant was charged with simple robbery after he stole money from a cash register in the presence of a pharmacist); - 86 (Minn. 1966) (affirmin
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    e district cour t erred in its jury instructions proceeds from the premise, based in caselaw, that one of the elements of first-degree aggravated robbery is that the defendant took property from another “know[ing] [that] he is not entitled to the property he takes.” -30 (Minn. 1983); State v. Sandve , State v. Bonga
  • State v. Bowen 921 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 2019
  • State v. Bowen 921 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 2019
    a robbery conviction where the defendant participated in taking money from a gas station); State v. LaJeunesse , 280 Minn. 381 , , 262 (1968) (affirming a robbery conviction where the defendant took money from a grocery store); State v. Sandve , 279 Minn. 229 , , 231 (1968) (affirming a robbery conviction where the defendant took money from a hotel); State v. Bonga , 278 Minn. 181 , , 128 (1967) (affirming a robbery conviction where the defendant took money from a drug store); State v. Sorg , 27
  • State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
  • State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
    State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bongo, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Hale 453 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Hale 453 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1990
    See, e.g., State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551, 552 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181, 186
  • State v. Abraham 338 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1983
  • Distinguished State v. Abraham 338 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1983
    State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Charlton 338 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Charlton 338 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1983
    State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181, 186 , should not be read as requiring a mens rea of knowledge alone.
  • State v. Nurmi 336 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Nurmi 336 N.W.2d 65 Minn. 1983
    State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Tenhoff 322 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Tenhoff 322 N.W.2d 354 Minn. 1982
    State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Case 312 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Case 312 N.W.2d 246 Minn. 1981
    State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Kittleson 305 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Kittleson 305 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1981
    State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. DeFoe 241 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1976
  • State v. DeFoe 241 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1976
    See, State v. Olson, 298 Minn. 551 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Olson 214 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1974
  • State v. Olson 214 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1974
    See, State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181 , People v. Hood, 1 Cal.
  • State v. Kolodge 196 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Kolodge 196 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1972
    State v. O’Donnell, 280 Minn. 213 , State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181
  • State v. Mills 185 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1971
  • State v. Mills 185 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1971
    State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181 , 153 N. W. (2d) 127 ; State v. Crosby, 277 Minn. 22 , 151 N. W. (2d) 297 .
  • State v. Thompson 173 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1970
  • State v. Thompson 173 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 1970
    We disposed of similar contentions in State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181 , 153 N. W. (2d) 127 , and State v. Sandve, 279 Minn. 229 , 156 N. W. (2d) 230 .
  • State v. O'DONNELL 158 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
  • State v. O'DONNELL 158 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
    See the recent case of State v. Bonga, 278 Minn. 181, 186 , 153 N. W. (2d) 127, 130 , where this court held: “While defendant was no doubt under the influence of the liquor he had consumed, and while his crime was far from artfully executed, we feel that the trial court properly rejected his defense of intoxication.” Defendant also contends that evidence of other crimin